Manner of Settlement in Last Two Contract Negotiations (Mediation, Fact Finding, etc.) lone negotiated , one mediation 44, Petition SdQmitted By: | Labor Organization Party O Employer / OJointly @ 46, Title ||Regiona! Supervisor, IBPO @ 47. Date (mmidddlyyyy) | [8102/2017 | eal entative of Other Party @ 49. Title If Petition is brought Individually, | hereby state @ 51. Signatyte-of w 50.
Wallack requested: [1] Any settlement agreements involving employees of the governors office since 2018 [2] Any severance agreements involving employees of the governors office since 2018 that contained a non-disclosure or non-disparagement clause. In a February 16, 2023 response, the Records Access Officer for the Office of the Governor advised Mr. Wallack that, [the Office] [is] unable to provide records responsive to your request.
Rodriguez requested all documents pertaining to the lawsuit listed on the profile of Irina Natapov, M.D. including, docket number, court county, all settlements, the case Complaint etc. The Board responded to Ms. Baxter on August 26, 2020, providing two pages of responsive records, and withholding others pursuant to Exemption (a) of the Public Records Law. Unsatisfied with this response, Mr.
Herman requested numerous records regarding a settlement agreement between the City of Boston Public Schools and a named employee executed in 2020. On June 17, 2022, the City responded. Unsatisfied with the Citys response, Mr. Herman petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR22/1433, was opened as a result.
A 2013 Superior Court decision provides further guidance with respect to the public nature of separation, severance, transition or settlement agreements, as well as the types of personnel information included within such agreements that may be exempt from disclosure. See Globe Newspaper Company, Inc. v. Executive Office of Administration and Finance, et al, Suffolk Superior Court Civil Action No. 11-01184-A (June 14, 2013), 34-35.
The Appellant did not file an opposition to this motion but did enter into negotiations regarding a possible settlement of the matter. The Respondent subsequently contacted the Commission with proposed language to supplement its original motion for reconsideration.
Mazurs appeal (G2-09361), the parties reached a settlement agreement and the Commission approved their joint request for relief. Mr. Fosters appeal (G2-09-360) proceeded to a full evidentiary hearing and the Commission issued a decision denying his appeal. The Commission fully addressed the underlying issues regarding the Appellants request for investigation in Case No.
EMPLOYER: thi Sh | _ REASON FOR RECOMMEDING CLOSURE: y Settled After Mediation C7] Settle During Fact Finding | | | (] Settled Post Fact Finding Rpt No Mediation [1 Settied Post Fact Finding Mediation Oo Withdrawn [] Other: OTHER COMMENTS: (e.g. additional settlement i.e. ULPs) mere OLAI se 2/1118