In May 2019, the Department received notice that the Appellant had filed a complaint against the Department with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD). (Testimony of Chief Lipson) 14. In July 2019, the Appellant received a written reprimand for violating the chain of command. (Resp. Ex. 5) 15. On August 13, 2019, the Appellant discovered a highlighted page from the union contract in her Department mailbox.

Hussey-Rogers by a former supervisor for successfully pursuing a gender discrimination claim at the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD). (Exh.44) Rogers office and the building where Mr. DeLucas office is located. (Exhs.37A through 37E & 38ID; Testimony of Appellant) The Mondamin Court Incident 8. On May 30, 2017, Ms.

Lima also filed a claim with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination against Somerville for employment discrimination, which the parties settled in 2019 by agreement (the 2019 MCAD Settlement). (Resp.Exh.6) 9. In addition to monetary compensation ($10,000) paid by Somerville to Mr. Lima, the 2019 MCAD Settlement also provided, in relevant part: 4.

Allegations of violations of this Article shall be processed only to the appropriate agency, i.e. complaints to the Massachusetts Labor Relations 2 Commission or the Commission Against Discrimination (or court), where violations of the statute are involved. ARTICLE 4 WORKWEEK The work week for employees shall consist of four (4) consecutive days of eight (8) consecutive hours followed by two (2) days off (4 and 2).

The parties agree to discuss issues raised by the Americans with Disabilities Act on an as needed basis and as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and for the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCA D) issue appropriate regulations regarding handicap discrimination, Section 3.

Section 3: The Union agrees that neither its officers, members, nor persons employed by the Union, shall discriminate against or coerce any employees for nonmembership in the Union. 1 Section 4: Enforcement of this article shall exclusively be by the filing of a charge of discrimination or prohibited practices with the state's Commission Against Discrimination or Labor Relations Commission, but not as a grievance.

The parties agree that an employee alleging a violation of this Section, (or any other form of discrimination or retaliation prohibited by law,) who files a charge with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD) and/or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), or who files a claim of unlawful discrimination or retaliation in court, shall have elected an agency/judicial resolution of his/her claim, and the Union shall not

The parties agree that an employee alleging a violation of this Section, (or any other form of discrimination or retaliation prohibited by law,) who files a charge with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD) and/or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), or who files a claim of unlawful discrimination or retaliation in court, shall have elected an agency/judicial resolution of his/her claim, and the Union shall not

Allegations of violations of this Article shall be processed only to the appropriate agency, i.e. complaints to the Massachusetts Labor Relations Commission or the Commission Against Discrimination (or court), where violations of the statute are involved. ARTICLE 6 - ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION A.

Allegations of violations of this Article shall be processed only to the appropriate agency, i.e. complaints to the Massachusetts Labor Relations Commission or the Commission Against Discrimination (or court), where violations of the statute are involved. ARTICLE 6 - ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION A.