CLIFFORD &t KENNY, LLP ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW Via USPS & Email September 27, 2013 | Hearing Officer Susan Atwater Department of Labor Relations 19 Staniford Street, 1st Floor Boston, MA 02114 RE: Chelsea Fire Fighters. Local 937 v. City of Chelsea Case No.
For example, in Cambridge Public Health Commission, 26 MLC City ofBoston, MLC 7 MLC 129, 137 (2010), the issue was failure to provide information. 1707 (1980), City of Malden 8 MLC 1620 and Town of Brookline, 20 1570 (1994), the charge was a failure to bargain over a mandatory change.
Telephone Number Alfred Gordon 617-367-7200 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) c/o Pyle Rome Ehrenberg PC, 18 Tremont Street, Suite 500, Boston MA 10. Fax Number 02108 617-367-4820 11. This charge is filed against (check one) 12.
BOSTON, MA 02114 PROCEDURE FOR SCHEDULING OF THE EXPEDITED HEARING Case No.: 13-2683 Charging Party: Chelsea Firefighters Union Local 937 Respondent: Chelsea, City of Date Filed: 03/18/2013 The parties are directed to confer as soon as possible in order to schedule the Expedited _ Hearing in the above-referenced case.
Edward Srednicki Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Labor Relations 19 Staniford Street, 1 Floor Boston, MA 02114 RE: MUP -13-2683 Mr. Srednicki, Enclosed please find the Answer to the above charge on behalf of the Respondent City of Chelsea in the above titled matter.
Edward Srednicki Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Labor Relations 19 Staniford Street, 1 Floor Boston, MA 02114 RE: MUP -13-2683 Mr. Srednicki, Enclosed please find the Answer to the above charge on behalf of the Respond ent City of Chelsea in the above titled matter. Sincerely, John J. Clifford, Esq.
Srednicki Executive Secretary Department of Labor Relations 19 Staniford Street Boston, MA 02114 Re: City of Chelsea and Chelsea Firefighters, Local 937, [AFF Case No.: MUP-13-2683 Dear Mr. Srednicki: Please be advised that the City of Chelsea hereby withdraws its appeal of the above- referenced decision of the Commonwealth Employment Relations Board. Very truly yo KHH/mh ce: T.
Any questions concerning this notice or compliance with its provisions may be directed to the Department of Labor Relations, 19 Staniford Street, 1% Floor, Boston MA 02114 (Telephone: (617) 626-7132). APPENDIX A Undisputed Facts 1. The City is a public employer within the meaning of Section 1 of the Law. 2. The Union is an employee organization within the meaning of Section 1 of the Law. 3.
Any questions concerning this notice or compliance with its provisions may be directed to the Department of Labor Relations, 19 Staniford Street, 1% Floor, Boston MA 02114 (Telephone: (617) 626-7132). APPENDIX A Undisputed Facts 1. The City is a public employer within the meaning of Section 1 of the Law. 2. The Union is an employee organization within the meaning of Section 1 of the Law. 3.
Telephone Number Ryan Dunn 617-878-8280 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) MTA, 20 Ashburton Place, Boston, MA 5. Fax Number 02108 10. Fax Number 617-248-6921 11. This charge is filed against (check one) 12.
Complaint of Prohibited Practice Interim Procedure for Scheduling of the Expedited Hearing P:\TM Decuments\Merge Templates\TM NOTICE LEVEL 1 OF COMPLAINT HEARING.doc - COMMONWEALTH DEPARTMENT OF MASSACHUSETTS OF LABOR RELATIONS 19 STANIFORD STREET, 1" FLOOR BOSTON, MA 02114 PROCEDURE FOR SCHEDULING OF THE EXPEDITED HEARING Case No.: MUP-15-4847 Charging Party: Spencer-East Brookfield Teachers Assn. Respondent: Spencer-East Brookfield Reg.
Srednicki, Executive Secretary The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Labor Relations 19 Staniford Street, 1st Floor Boston, MA 02114 Re: Spencer-East Brookfield Teachers Association and Spencer-East Brookfield Regional School District DLR Case No.: MUP-15-4847 (After School Program ULP (DLR) 15) Dear Mr.
Srednicki, Executive Secretary The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Labor Relations 19 Staniford Street, 1st Floor Boston, MA 02114 Re: Spencer-East Brookfield Teachers Association and Spencer-East Brookfield Regional School District . DLR Case No.: MUP-15-4847 (After School Program ULP (DLR) 15) Dear Mr.
Municipal Ct. of the City ofBoston, 359 Mass. 211, 214 (1971). Basic merit principles, as defined in G. L. c. 31, 1, require that applicants be selected and advanced on the basis of their relative ability, knowledge and skills, assured fair and equal treatment in all aspects of personnel administration, and that they be protected from arbitrary and capricious action. Tallman v. City of Holyoke, et al., G- 9 2134, and compare Flynn v.
Municipal Ct. of the City ofBoston, 359 Mass. 214 (1971). In determining whether the Appointing Authority had reasonable justification to take the action of bypassing the Appellant, the Commission must consider the fundamental purpose of the Civil Service System which is to protect against overtones of political control, objectives unrelated to merit standards and assure neutrally applied public policy.
Municipal Ct. of the City ofBoston, 359 Mass. 211, 214 (1971). 8 The Commission determines justification for discipline by inquiring, "whether the employee has been guilty of substantial misconduct which adversely affects the public interest by impairing the efficiency of public service." Murray v. Second Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 389 Mass. 508, 514 (1983); School Committee of Brockton v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App.
Municipal Ct. of the City ofBoston, 359 Mass. 211, 214 (1971). The Commission determines justification for discipline by inquiring, "whether the employee has been guilty of substantial misconduct which adversely affects the public interest by impairing the efficiency of public service." Murray v. Second Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 389 Mass. 508, 514 (1983); School Committee of Brockton v. Civil Service 9 Commission, 43 Mass. App.
See, e.g., City ofBoston, 43 MLC 157, 163 (2016), reaching that result where the union inexplicably demanded bargaining over an employer decision that was exempt from a bargaining obligation instead of bargaining over its impacts.
City ofBoston, 8 MLC 1113, 1115 (1981); Belmont School Committee, 4 MLC 1189, 1193 (H.0. 1977), aff'd, 4 MLC 1707 (1978). Unfortunately, unless MMEA is in receipt of a signed copy of the settlement agreement by Friday, December 4, 2020, we will have no choice but to pursue another Charge of Prohibited Practice at the DLR. I sincerely hope this action to enforce the law is not necessary. 18.
Municipal Ct. of the City ofBoston, 359 Mass. 211, 214 (1971). The Commission determines justification for discipline by inquiring, "whether the employee has been guilty of substantial misconduct which adversely affects the public interest by impairing the efficiency of public service." Murray v. Second Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 389 Mass. 508, 514 (1983); School Committee of Brockton v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App.
City ofBoston, et. al., Suffolk Superior Court, Civil Action No. 2384CV2395, the Court in its June 20, 2024 Decision and Order on Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Public Records Responses, found that personnel files . . . shall be considered exempt under exemption (c). Id. at 6.