Locke and the School Committee engaged in settlement talks for the charge, and the School Committees attorney Marc Terry (Terry) emailed Locke a draft settlement agreement. On or about January 25, 2022, Locke contacted Cordio to request that an attorney review the settlement agreement. Cordio reached out to MTA Field Representative, James Kobialka (Kobialka) about Lockes request.

Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): I 40. Name Dora Locke 42. Telephone Number 508-736-1752 41. Representative to contact Dora Locke 43,44,45,46.

Officer Ventrella again fails to analyze Lockes assertions and is wrong by saying that Dunn responded to Locke and explained each section of the settlement agreement that she was questioning. Dunn simply explained things as he saw fit and explained things in a way that a complete ignorant would have figured out by him or herself.

One of the agreements cited pertains to a contract settlement with the Commonwealth where funds were appropriated in advance of the settlement of this contract. This agreement enjoyed a status that was in accord with Secretarys Shors statements. The University by contrast, remained without any bargaining reserves in contradiction to Secretary Shors statements.

Charging party has asserted that the specific reserve established by St. 2015, c. 10 for the University is intended for future bargaining settlements and is independent of the legislative validation created by section 65. The reserve established by section 2 line item 1599-4299 provides a partial reserve for the University of $2.2 million for agreements that have not yet been ratified by the general court.

Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15 04(1) INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY Name 17. Maintenance and Trades Unit/MTA/NEA 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Matthew D. Jones, Esq. (617) 878-8283 21. Fax Number Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 19.

However, it is clear that while in executive session, the Council discussed with its attorneys its litigating strategy concerning the Brockton Power matter, including possible settlement. The Council entered into executive session again during its December 15, 2014 meeting, following the same procedure, and continued its discussion with its attorneys regarding the litigation and the possibility of settlement.

Rocheleau requested a copy, in electronic format such as PDF or Word, of: "[a]ny/all settlement agreement regarding the provision of special education services(s) and/or educational placement(s) for students with disabilities entered into by your [School] with parent(s)/guardian(s) from Jan. 1, 2010 through present." On February 26, 2020, the School provided Mr.

Herman requested 2 particular settlement agreements involving the Boston Police Department. Previous Appeal This request has been the subject of a previous appeal. See SPR20/1085 Determination of the Supervisor of Records (July 16, 2020). In my July 16th determination, I found that the City had not met its burden of specificity to redact the responsive settlement agreements pursuant to Exemptions (a) and (c) of the Public Records Law.

A full evidentiary hearing commenced on April 9, 2001, but was not completed, apparently due to the parties attempts to reach a settlement. On December 26, 2001, prior to resumption of the hearing or consummation of a settlement, Mr. Dawson died. The Estate of James Dawson (Estate) moved to be substituted as a party, which motion the DOC opposed and moved for Summary Decision dismissing the appeal.

Yes No Note: The Division may decline to issue @ complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17, Name 18. United Steelworkers, Local 5696 19. Representative to contact 20. Alan J. McDonald 508 485 6600 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21.

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, through the Department of Transitional Assistance (DTA), has violated c, 150E by repudiating the attached settlement agreement/memorandum of understanding, attached hereto as Exhibit 1, which was signed in or about November 2012.

Srednicki: Pursuant to a settlement agreement between the parties in the above referenced matter, the Union hereby withdraws the Charge of Prohibited Practice. An In-Person Investigative Conference was scheduled for this matter on July zo, 2016. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Sincerely yours, Jo Fletcher Assistant to Ian 0. Russell cc: Mailing Address: Mark Detwiler, Esq.

lv] Yes L] No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1) The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION 17. Name Boston Teachers Union 19. ON CHARGING PARTY 18. Representative to contact 20.

ai a3 ) WITHDRAWAL OF CHARGE In accordance with the terms of a settlement agreement reached by the parties, charging party Boston Teachers Union hereby withdraws the above captioned charge of prohibited practice.

Singh, Samantha From: Sent: To: Ce: Subject: (DLR) Eli Gillen Thursday, February 20, 2020 10:56 AM Singh, Samantha (DLR); dfelper@bowditch.com Jackie Rucci RE: MUP-19-7624 Amended Notice of In-Person Investigation w/ Mediation Good morning, The Union and Town have finalized a settlement, as such the Union would like to withdraw the charge against the Town.

As such we are moving We have filed a grievance, but the Board of Selectmen have ignored the grievance procedure. forward with arbitration. been made by the charging Note: The OLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions.

. | Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party isis an < n Individual (), Employee Organization (O), Employer O (E): 40. Name Al. Representative to contact 42.