One of the agreements cited pertains to a contract settlement with the Commonwealth where funds were appropriated in advance of the settlement of this contract. This agreement enjoyed a status that was in accord with Secretarys Shors statements. The University by contrast, remained without any bargaining reserves in contradiction to Secretary Shors statements.

Charging party has asserted that the specific reserve established by St. 2015, c. 10 for the University is intended for future bargaining settlements and is independent of the legislative validation created by section 65. The reserve established by section 2 line item 1599-4299 provides a partial reserve for the University of $2.2 million for agreements that have not yet been ratified by the general court.

Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15 04(1) INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY Name 17. Maintenance and Trades Unit/MTA/NEA 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Matthew D. Jones, Esq. (617) 878-8283 21. Fax Number Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 19.

However, it is clear that while in executive session, the Council discussed with its attorneys its litigating strategy concerning the Brockton Power matter, including possible settlement. The Council entered into executive session again during its December 15, 2014 meeting, following the same procedure, and continued its discussion with its attorneys regarding the litigation and the possibility of settlement.

Rocheleau requested a copy, in electronic format such as PDF or Word, of: "[a]ny/all settlement agreement regarding the provision of special education services(s) and/or educational placement(s) for students with disabilities entered into by your [School] with parent(s)/guardian(s) from Jan. 1, 2010 through present." On February 26, 2020, the School provided Mr.

A full evidentiary hearing commenced on April 9, 2001, but was not completed, apparently due to the parties attempts to reach a settlement. On December 26, 2001, prior to resumption of the hearing or consummation of a settlement, Mr. Dawson died. The Estate of James Dawson (Estate) moved to be substituted as a party, which motion the DOC opposed and moved for Summary Decision dismissing the appeal.

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, through the Department of Transitional Assistance (DTA), has violated c, 150E by repudiating the attached settlement agreement/memorandum of understanding, attached hereto as Exhibit 1, which was signed in or about November 2012.

Srednicki: Pursuant to a settlement agreement between the parties in the above referenced matter, the Union hereby withdraws the Charge of Prohibited Practice. An In-Person Investigative Conference was scheduled for this matter on July zo, 2016. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Sincerely yours, Jo Fletcher Assistant to Ian 0. Russell cc: Mailing Address: Mark Detwiler, Esq.

Yes No Note: The Division may decline to issue @ complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17, Name 18. United Steelworkers, Local 5696 19. Representative to contact 20. Alan J. McDonald 508 485 6600 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21.

Herman requested 2 particular settlement agreements involving the Boston Police Department. Previous Appeal This request has been the subject of a previous appeal. See SPR20/1085 Determination of the Supervisor of Records (July 16, 2020). In my July 16th determination, I found that the City had not met its burden of specificity to redact the responsive settlement agreements pursuant to Exemptions (a) and (c) of the Public Records Law.

Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Labor Relations Withdrawal of Charge of Prohibited Practice se EVU ston Z = L. gC) S FH (sareing (Case No.) with prejudice. ot Cherding Party Signature Put itl Fen &y i Printed Naine Q/| y U Date Party), hereby withdraws COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) Commonwealth of Massachusetts (Department of Children and Families) ) ) ) ) and SUP-16-5067 Re: Crystal Harding ) SEIU Local 509 ) ) ) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

lV] Yes LJ No Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(1). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name Alliance, AFSME-SEIU, Local 509 19. 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Patrick N. Bryant, Esq. 617-367-7200 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21.

WITHDRAWAL OF CHARGE BASED ON SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Dr. Ben Branch timely challenged the April 7, 2016, agency fee demand of the Massachusetts Society of Professors/MTA/NEA (Union) by filing a prohibited practice charge with the Division of Labor Relations (DLR). The DLR docketed Dr. Branchs prohibited practice charge as ASF-16-5195. Thereafter, to avoid unnecessary burden on all parties, Dr.

Please be advised that pursuant to the settlement agreement entered into between the parties, the MSP withdraws its agency fee demand against Ben Branch in the above referenced matter pending a determination by the Appeals Court in the case of ASF-14-377, ASF-14-3919 and ASF-14-3920. issues.

WITHDRAWAL OF CHARGE BASED ON SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Dr. Andre Melcuk timely challenged the April 28, 2015, agency fee demand of the Professional Staff Union/MTA/NEA (Union) by filing a prohibited practice charge with the Division of Labor Relations (DLR). The DLR docketed Dr. Melcuks prohibited practice charge as ASF-15-4556. Thereafter, to avoid unnecessary burden on all parties, Dr.