us had spotless work records, and three of us were considered by Herby Duverne to be three of the best Aviation Officers, but within a matter of a few months of Michele Freadman taking over as the Deputy Director o Aviation Security, Michele Freadman purposefully destroyed all three of our careers at Massport, in retaliation for us having reported Michele Freadman and Matt Hatfield to the Department of Labor Relations (DLR) and the Massachusetts Commission

American Federation of State County & Municipal Employees Local 1636 (the Union), and the Town of Falmouth, its agents, employees, and officials (the "Town" or Employer), WHEREAS, the matter of employee's separation from employment on August 19, 2010 is before the Division of Labor Relations in case number ARB-033-2011 based on the employees appeal and the Union's grievance; WHEREAS, Employee has also commenced complaints before the Massachusetts Commission

Commission Against Discrimination and the Ethics Commission in connection with the Appellants bypass. 13 In a new background investigation process at the HFD in 2017, uniformed members of the department conducted the background investigation of applicants for the firefighter position. On his application, the Appellant wrote that his home address was a specific address (redacted) in Holyoke, also writing that his wife (Ms.

Agreement contained the following restriction: Local agrees either on behalf of the Union and/or individual(s), any pending or potential claims and/or actions against the Authority, regardless of their nature, that directly or indirectly arise from an implementation of the terms and conditions of this Letter Agreement, including but not limited to internal complaints, grievances and actions taken under state and federal law at the Massachusetts Commission

Finney has filed a charge of discrimination with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD), alleging disability discrimination by the Collaborative when it chose her for layoff. Her MCAD charge fails to allege that she was laid off because she did not have the appropriate license.

Any employee who feels that the Authority has not satisfactorily resolved her/his complaint may appeal to the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrim ination or the Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Any charges of discrimination shall not be subject to the grievance and arbitration procedu re set forth in Article V of this Agreement. Article V - Grievance and Arbitration Procedure Section 1.

The Union's misperception on the issue apparently arises from a position statement filed by the Employer with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD) in response to a Charge of Discrimination filed by Sebestyen on October 21,2014.

Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD) Boston Office: One Ashburton Place, Room 601, Boston, MA Tel: (617) 727-3990. 2. 02108 United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) One Congress Street, 10" Floor Boston, MA 02114 Tel: (617) 565-3200 ARTICLE MANAGEMENT 8 RIGHTS All management functions, rights and responsibilities which the Employer has not expressly modified or restricted by a specific provision of this Agreement

Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination, 67 Mass.App.Ct. 404, 407-408 (2006).

In the event that the grievant(s) and/or the Union elect to seek redress through any other remedy or proceeding established and existing under federal or state law (other than complaints before the Massachusetts Labor Relations Commis sion, the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, brought to meet agency timelines but not to be simultaneously litigated), the Employer/University Administration

In the event that the grievant(s) and/or the Union elect to seek redress through any other remedy or proceeding established and existing under federal or state law (other than complaints before the Massachusetts Labor Relations Commission, the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, brought to meet agency timelines but not to be simultaneously litigated), the Employer/University Administration

Coronite have all been singled out and fired in retaliation for having filed complaints with the Department of Labor Relations (DLR) and the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD) against Massport and our Union. Myself, Aviation Officer Emerson, and Sgt.

Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination, 431 Mass. 655 (2000). See Town of Brookfield, 28 MLC 320, 327. According to the first step in the Wynn & Wynn analysis, a charging party meets its initial burden by proffering direct evidence that proscribed criteria, here, engaging in concerted, protected activity, played a motivating part in a respondent's adverse action. Town of Brookfield, 28 MLC 320, 328, citing Wynn & Wynn, 431 Mass. at 667.