Whitman-Hanson Regional School Committee, 9 MLC 1615 (1983), citing, City ofBoston, 7 MLC at 1224. It is clear, the filing of a grievance does not imbue employees with immunity from discipline for conduct that would have been disciplined in the absence of the protected activity. In an even more attenuated argument, the Union attempts to argue that Ms.
Fax Number Feinberg, Campbell & Zack, P.C., 177 Milk Street, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA 02109 22. 617-338-7070 The Charging Party is an: [ Individual Employee Organization [_ Employer DECLARATION | have read the above charge of prohibited practice and swear under the pains and penalties of perjury that the information contained in it is true and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. Name (print) Safe) re Renee J.
Fax Number Feinberg, Campbell & Zack, P.C., 177 Milk Street, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA 22. 02109 617-338-7070 The Charging Party is an: LJ Individual Employee Organization L] Employer DECLARATION | have read the above charge of prohibited practice and swear under the pains and penalties of perjury that the information contained in it is true and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. Name (print) Sigfgture Title (if any) Renee J.
Address (street and no., city/town, state, and ZIP code) Pyle Rome Ehrenberg PC, 2 Liberty Square, 10th Floor, Boston, MA 02109 15. Fax Number 617-367-4820 *** Questions 16 and 17 relate only to Petitions filed pursuant to M.G.L. c.150E * * * 16. Has the Petitioner complied with the filing requirements of M.G.L. 150E 13 and 14? Yes L | No 17.
Seaport West 155 Seaport Boulevard Boston, MA 02210-2600 617.832.1000 main 617.832.7000 fax Jonathan A. Keselenko 617-832-1208 direct JAK@foleyhoag.com August 14, 2020 Via E-mail Commonwealth Employment Relations Board Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Labor Relations Charles F. Hurley Building 19 Staniford St.
Municipal Ct. of the City ofBoston, 359 Mass. 211, 213-17 & n.1 (1971) (directing affirmance of civil service commission decision upholding city mayors just cause suspension and dismissal of police officer notwithstanding not guilty verdict on underlying assault and battery charges against officer); Faria v. Third Bristol Div. of Dist. Ct., 14 Mass. App.
Fax Number 617-367-6027 Labor Organization's Address (street and no., city/town, state, and zip code) 8 Beacon St, Boston, MA 02108 14. Labor Organization's Representative's Name Erin DeRenzis 17. 15. Email Address 16. Telephone Number ederenzis@afscme93.org Address (street and no., city/town, state, and zip code) 617-367-6029 18.
Van Campen Jared General Counsel AFSCME Council 93 8 Beacon Street Boston, MA 02108 (617)367-6026 Associate General Counsel AFSCME Council 93 8 Beacon Street Boston, MA 02108 (617) 367-6002 rvancampen@atscme93.org ikelly@atscme93 org DATED: December 3, 2021 18 J
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 979-1900 MARK OTOOLE, Appellant v. G2-21-119 CITY OF LYNN, Respondent and CHRISTOPHER REDDY, Intervenor Appearance for Appellant: Joseph L. Sulman, Esq. Law Office of Joseph Sulman 391 Totten Pond Road, Suite 402 Waltham, MA 02451 Appearance for Respondent: John P. Slattery, Esq. Ronald A. Wysocki, Attorney at Law, Inc.
Massachusetts Department of Revenue 100 Cambridge Street Box 9557 Boston, MA 02114 Commissioner: Daniel M. Henderson DECISION Pursuant to the provisions of M.G.L. c. 30 49 and 57, the Appellant Louise A.
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 PAUL R. MURPHY, Appellant v. D-03-405 SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent Appellants Attorney: Thomas J. Barrett, Esq. 314 Essex Street Salem, MA 01970 (978) 745-0745 tbarrett@tbarrettlaw.com Respondents Attorney: Daniel B. Kulak, Esq. 40 Lowell Street: Suite 14 Peabody, MA 01960 (978) 532-2060 dan.kulak@verizon.net Commissioner: Christopher C.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 WILLIAM HATFIELD, Appellant v. TOWN OF HULL FIRE DEPARTMENT, Respondent D1-15-121 Appearance for Appellant: William Hatfield, Pro Se Appearance for Respondent: James B. Lampke, Esq. Town Counsel Town of Hull 115 North Street Suite 3 Hingham, MA 02043 Commissioner: Paul M.
If one party to the negotiations indicates a desire to continue bargaining, it demonstrates that the parties have not exhausted impasse. all possibilities of compromise and precludes a finding of Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 25 MLC at 205 (1999) (citing City ofBoston, 21 MLC 1350 (1994)).
City ofBoston, 8 MLC 1872, 1875, MUP-3994 (February 25, 1982); Town of Shrewsbury, 5 MLC 1519, 1523, MUP-2999 (December 22, 1978). To be A charging partys failure to establish a prima facie case obviates the need to inquire into the adequacy of the employers non-discriminatory explanation.
Investigator, Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Labor Relations, 19 Staniford Street, 1st Floor, Boston, MA 02114 at holly.accica2@state.ma.us and Jonathan Conti, Esq. Massachusetts Teachers Association, 2 Heritage Drive, 8th Floor, Quincy, MA, 02171-2119 at jconti@massteacher.org. Kimberly A. Rozak, Esq. Dated: March 21, 2023 {Client Matter 24929/00013/A8240419.DOCX} 5
In 2008, Officer Gutwill was assigned to a Drug Enforcement Administration The Investigator dismissed the Unions allegation that the City independently violated Section 10(a)(1) of the Law. 1 On January 30, 2020 and March 4, 2020, the hearing was held in person at the DLRs office in Boston, MA. On August 20, 2020, due to the on-going COVID-19 pandemic, the hearing was held by video conference. 2 2 H.O.
City ofBoston, 35 MLC 289, 291 MUP-04-4077 (May 20, 2009); see Sallis v. University of Minnesota, 408 F. 470, 476 (8th Cir. 2005). No such adverse personnel actions occurred here. There must be real harm and subjective feelings of disappointment and disillusionment will not suffice. Town of Blackstone & MACOP Local 442, MUP-16-5329 (March 14, 2018), 2018 WL 1638340, citing MacCormack v. Boston Edison, Co., 423 Mass. 652, 663-664 (1996).
See City ofBoston and AFSCME Council 93, MUP-10-5793 (September 16, 2013), 2013 WL 5488785. 8 Here, if anything the evidence presented in this matter showed that Gutwill received the same or even preferential treatment compared to his fellow officers, not differential or discriminatory treatment.
See City ofBoston, 8 MLC 1872, 1876 (1982) (Even though no evidence exists of other individuals being treated adversely, the hearing officer could properly infer that the City was motivated to penalize Harrington, the organizer of the suit). Complaints to a municipal employer about working conditions are also concerted activity. See, e.g., id. at 1875 (involving complaint to city council regarding civilianization of police department).