Department of Conservation and Recreation, 22 MCSR 689 (2009)(Environmental Analyst III appeal denied) affd, Straub v. Civil Service Commission & another, Superior Court C.A. No. SUCV2010-04143 (2013); Kurker v. Department of Conservation and Recreation, 22 MCSR 357 (2009)(Ranger II appeal allowed); Guidmond v. Department of Correction, 27 MCSR 327 (2014)(Correction Program Officer appeal denied); Messier v.

Department of Conservation and Recreation, 21 MCSR 23 (2008); Pollock and Medeiros v. Department of Mental Retardation, 22 MCSR 276 (2009); Pease v. 5 Department of Revenue, 22 MCSR 284 (2009) & 22 MCSR 754 (2009); Poe v. Department of Revenue, 22 MCSR 287 (2009); Garfunkel v. Department of Revenue, 22 MCSR 291 (2009); Foster v. Department of Transitional Assistance, 23 MCSR 528; Heath v. Department of Transitional Assistance, 23 MCSR 548.

Department of Conservation and Recreation, 21 MCSR 23 (2008); Pollock and Medeiros v. Department of Mental Retardation, 22 MCSR 276 (2009); Pease v. Department of Revenue, 22 MCSR 284 (2009) & 22 MCSR 754 (2009); Poe v. Department of Revenue, 22 MCSR 287 (2009); Garfunkel v. Department of Revenue, 22 MCSR 291 5 (2009); Foster v. Department of Transitional Assistance, 23 MCSR 528; Heath v. Department of Transitional Assistance, 23 MCSR 548.

The purpose of the detail was to provide traffic control in connection with a beach nourishment project funded by the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR). The project involved the movement of sand and rocks to Winthrop beach. The detail ran from 7 A.M. until 3 P.M., and the detail officer was to receive a one-hour lunch break and bathroom breaks as needed.

Department of Conservation and Recreation, 21 MCSR 23 (2008); Pollock and Medeiros v. Department of Mental Retardation, 22 MCSR 276 (2009); Pease v. Department of Revenue, 22 MCSR 284 (2009) & 22 MCSR 754 (2009); Poe v. Department of Revenue, 22 MCSR 287 (2009); Garfunkel v. Department of Revenue, 22 MCSR 291 (2009); Foster v. Department of Transitional Assistance, 23 MCSR 528; Heath v. Department of Transitional Assistance, 23 MCSR 548.

Department of Revenue, Department of Conservation & Recreation, 534 (2010); Pease v. v. Department_of Revenue, 22 22 MCSR 291 (2009); Asiaf v. 21 MCSR 23 (2008). In other circumstances, the Commission had deplored the undue reliance on provisional appointments. Id.

Another example is at the Department of Conservation and Recreation. The general category for one new position was listed as Program Manager II with a functional title of Murphy Rink Complex Manager. Again, the Commonwealths own description supports the conclusion that it is Unit 6 work. The Commonwealth states that the job duties are to perform the day to day operations of this one rink: scheduling; maintenance; and permitting work.

Hurley Building 19 Staniford Street, 1st Floor Boston, MA 02114 Re: AFSCME, Council 93 and Commonwealth of Massachusetts/Department of Conservation and Recreation SUP-13-3221 Dear Executive Secretary Srednicki: The Respondent is requesting the full hearing in this matter, currently scheduled for December 15, 2014, be rescheduled to a mutually agreed upon date by the parties. As grounds for this request, the Respondent states the following: 1.

The Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) is a subsidiary of the EEA. The DCR is responsible for the maintenance of the Commonweaiths park system The EPOs perform work for the DCR, frequently by paid detail on overtime. Thomas Connors (Connors), an EPO who also functions as the detail officer, oversees the assignment of details to the Dismissal (cont'd) SUPL-19-7675 EPOs.

Department of Conservation and Recreation, 21 MCSR 23 (2008); Pollock and Medeiros v. Department of Mental Retardation, 22 MCSR 276 (2009); Pease v. Department of Revenue, 22 MCSR 284 (2009) & 22 MCSR 754 (2009); Poe v. Department of Revenue, 22 MCSR 287 (2009); Garfunkel v. Department of Revenue, 22 MCSR 291 (2009); Foster v. Department of Transitional Assistance, 23 MCSR 528; Heath v.