Kennedy Memorial Drive Braintree, MA 02184 Dear Lieutenant Ware: I have received the petition of Stephanie Ebbert, of the Boston Globe, appealing the response of the Braintree Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On March 30, 2023, Ms. Ebbert requested the following: A complete record of all calls for service from Baker Avenue that appeared on daily logs since 2018.
Baker, Braverman & Barbadoro 50 Braintree Hill Office Park Braintree, MA 02184 (781) 848-9610 Respondents Attorney: Brian Magner, Esq. Deutsch / Williams One Design Center Place Suite 600 Boston, MA 02210 (617) 951-2300 Commissioner: Christopher C.
Fax Number Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 8. 150 Wood Road, Suite 400, Braintree, MA 02108 11. This charge is filed against (check one) 42.
Totten 150 Wood Road, Suite 400, Braintree, MA 9. Telephone Number (781) 848-6006 40. Fax Number Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 8, (508) 747-1620 02360 Employee Organization (if any): 6. 4. Telephone Number 5.
Murphy Hesse Toomey & Lehane LLP 50 Braintree Hill Office Park, Suite 410 Braintree, MA 02184 By email only: pmello@mhtl.com RE: Open Meeting Law Complaint Dear Attorney Mello: This office received a complaint from Sean McNamara on November 21, 2023, alleging that the Attleboro Planning Board (the Board) violated the Open Meeting Law, G.L. c. 30A, 18-25.
Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane, LLP 50 Braintree Hill Office Park Braintree, MA 02184 By email only: pmello@mhtl.com RE: Open Meeting Law Complaint Dear Attorney Mello: This office received a complaint from Phil Johenning on June 14, 2024, alleging that the Milton Select Board (the Board) violated the Open Meeting Law, G.L. c. 30A, 18-25.
City Solicitor Murphy Hesse Toomey & Lehane, LLP 50 Braintree Office Hill Park, Suite 410 Braintree, MA 02184 Dear Attorney Mello: On May 1, 2023, this office received your petition on behalf of the City of Attleboro (City) requesting permission to charge for time spent segregating or redacting responsive records, as well as a waiver of statutory limits on fees that may be assessed in responding to the request. G. L. c. 66, 10(d)(iv).