City of Lynn, 28 MCSR 114 (2015) (a permanent building custodian who was serving as a provisional senior building custodian could not contest his three-day suspension imposed while he was serving in his provisional position); contrast with McDowell v. City of Springfield, 23 MCSR 124 (2010), upheld in relevant part and reversed in part, City of Springfield v. Civil Serv.

The Commissions June 2nd Response In its June 2nd response, the Commission stated, [i]t has come to the Commissions attention that, since February 1, 2022, the City of Lynn provided you with the two documents identified above that you sought in response to your January 17, 2022 public records request to the Commission, in unredacted form. Thus, the Commission now provides you with copies of those two responsive documents, as requested.

City of Lynn, 27 MLC 60, 61 (2000). The relevance of the requested information must be determined by the circumstances that exist at the time the union makes the request, not by the circumstances that exist at the time an arbitrator finally vindicates the unions right to the requested information. City of Somerville, 29 MLC 199, 202 (2003), citing City of Lynn, 27 MLC 60 (2000), Providence and Mercy Hospitals v.

City of Lynn, 27 MLC 60, 61 (2000). The relevance of the requested information must be determined by the circumstances that exist at the time the union makes the request, not by the circumstances that exist at the time an arbitrator finally vindicates the unions right to the requested information. City of Somerville, 29 MLC 199, 202 (2003), citing City of Lynn, 27 MLC 60 (2000), Providence and Mercy Hospitals v.

City of Lynn, 27 23 MLC 60, 61, MUP-2236, 2237 (December 1, 2000). The relevance of the requested - H.O. Decision (cont'd) SUP-17-5896 information must be determined by the circumstances that existed at the time when the exclusive bargaining representative made the request. Id. A. Relevant and Reasonably Necessary Information On January 20, 2017, the Union made its first request that DCF provide it with a copy of Lynch-Barteks report.

Cotter Administrative Services Records Division Lynn Police Department 300 Washington Street Lynn, MA 01902 Dear Lieutenant Cotter: I have received the petition of Blue POV appealing the response of the Lynn Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On September 24, 2023, the requestor sought records related to a specific arrest that occurred on February 4, 2022.

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records April 2, 2025 SPR25/0780 Lieutenant Robert Avery Records Access Officer Lynn Police Department 300 Washington Street Lynn, MA 01902 Dear Lieutenant Avery: I have received the petition of Mass Accountability Network (requestor) appealing the response of the Lynn Police Department (Department) to a request

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records May 23, 2025 SPR25/1387 Robert Avery Lieutenant Lynn Police Department 300 Washington Street Lynn, MA 01902-4718 Dear Lieutenant Avery: I have received the petition of Joshua F.

City of Lynn, CSC Case Nos. G2-07-65/G2-07-66, 22 MCSR --- (2009); Roberge v. Westfield G & E, 18 MCSR 247 (2005); Bullock v. Springfield Bd of Fire Commrs, 7 MCSR 36 (1994) The present case, however, does not involve the first clause, but, rather the second clause, which compels dismissal of an appeal if the same issues are presently being resolved in accordance with G.L.c.105E,8.

Similarly, City of Lynn v. Labor Relations Commn, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 172 (1997), stands solely for the noncontroversial proposition that where a bargaining obligation would conflict with the express terms of a statute not listed in G.L. c. 150E, 7(d), the statute prevails. In City of Lynn, the Appeals Court refused to countenance restrictions on the employers authority to exercise the discretion conferred upon it by statute.

Applying 9 indemnification to the City of Lynn framework is instructive and leads to the conclusion that Count VI must be dismissed. The hearing officers decision in that case hints at a suggestion (again in dicta) that there may be an impact bargaining obligation that emanates from a citys indemnification actions.

Similarly, City of Lynn v. Labor Relations Commn, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 172 (1997), stands solely for the noncontroversial proposition that where a bargaining obligation would conflict with the express terms of a statute not listed in G.L. c. 150E, 7(d), the statute prevails. In City of Lynn, the Appeals Court refused to countenance restrictions on the employers authority to exercise the discretion conferred upon it by statute.

The Unions position is supported by City of Lynn v Lynn Branch of Massachusetts Police Association. In City of Lynn, the Commission reviewed the Mayor of Lynns proposed budget and found that by failing to even attempt to fund the overtime and other provisions of the Citys CBA, that the City of Lynn had engaged in unilateral action in violation of 10(a)(5).

Gallo Public Records Access Officer Lynn Public Schools 100 Bennet Street Lynn, MA 01905 Dear Attorney Gallo: I have received the petition of Laura Ortiz appealing the response of the Lynn Public Schools (School) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On September 8, 2023, Ms. Ortiz requested various records regarding the McKinneyVento student statistics.