The appeal was heard by a magistrate at the Division of Administrative Law Appeals (DALA). Finding 2 of that decision states that the Appellant received a permanent appointment to position of laborer / motor equipment operator [labor service titles] on August 31, 2001. Apparently, the broader issue, now before the Commission, of whether any labor service employee hired after 1998 can be considered permanent, was not addressed.

The Commission overturned HRDs decision, concluding in part that the firefighter, based on the findings of a hearing officer at the Division of Administrative Law Appeals (DALA): a) did suffer injuries at the scene of a fire, citing the hearing officers report that the firefighter, on the way down a flight of stairs at the scene, appeared pale, suffered from shortness of breath, and felt a burning in his throat and chest; and b) those injuries caused

Turco appealed SRBs decision to the Division of Administrative Law Appeals (DALA). 14. On December 23, 2016, DALA affirmed SRBs decision. 15. On December 28, 2016, Ms. Turco forwarded an email to DOC stating: Kelley, this e-mail, per our conversation today, is a request to be re-hired. I did retire from Lemuel Shattuck Hospital December 19, 2015.

If you feel aggrieved by this decision, you have the right to file an appeal with the Division of Administrative Law Appeals within fifteen (15) days from the date you receive this letter.

If you feel aggrieved by this decision, you have the right to file an appeal with the Division of Administrative Law Appeals within fifteen (15) days from the date you receive this letter.

If you feel aggrieved by this decision, you have the right to file an appeal with the Division of Administrative Law Appeals within fifteen (15) days from the date you receive this letter.

On April 12, 2013, Division of Administrative Law Appeals (DALA) Administrative Magistrate Maria Imparato (Imparato) held a hearing concerning Aimes appeal and on July 1, 2013, DALA recommended that the Civil Service Commission affirm the decision to suspend Aime.

The Division of Administrative Law Appeals (DALA), by decision dated January 13, 2023, upheld the QRBs decision. The Appellants further appeal of the denial of his disability retirement application to the Contributory Retirement Appeals Board (CRAB) is pending. (Resp.Exh.5; Administrative Notice [Email dated 9/16/2024 to Commission from Appellants counsel]) 5 witnesses. The Appellant did not testify but introduced 11 exhibits.

L. c. 31, 42 and 43, on October 29, 1996, and a hearing took place before the division of administrative law appeals.

The arbitrator, in exercising authority hereunder, shall be governed by the just cause*standards of General Laws, Chapter 31, Sections 41 through 45, and shall be governed by any court rulings, Civil Service determinations, or Division of Administrative Law Appeals decisions, in that order, as they relate to General Laws, Chapter 31, Section 41 et seq. 7.