Both The Commission scheduled a further hearing on March 7, 2002, which it later postponed to November 7, 2002, On November 7, 2002, the DOC and Dawson reached a settlement and, based on that settlement, agreed to a voluntary dismissal of the case. The parties agreed that the DOC would posthumously reinstate Mr. Dawson to his former position of Sergeant.
X] Yes No Note: the division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 18. Representative to contact 17. Name Westport Federation of Teachers, Local 1906, Joseph R. Lettiere, Esq. AFT MA, AFT, AFL-CIO PO Box 617, Westport, MA 02790 20.
Hurley Building 19 Staniford St., 4th Floor DLR NOULS'L4 pw 3:53 Boston, MA 02114 RE: MUP-14-4026 Westport Federation of Teachers, Local 1906, AFT Massachusetts, AFL-CIO and Westport School Committee GR: Regressive and Surface Bargaining/Refusal to Bargain In Good Faith SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND WITHDRAWAL Dear Attorney See: Enclosed please find, for your file, a copy of the parties' Settlement Agreement.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ____________________________________ In the matter of ) ) AFSCME, Council 93, ) Elizabeth Otu-Wilkenson ) and ) SUP-21-8558 SUP-21-8753 ) SUP-21-8926 Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Executive Office of Health and Human Services, Department of Developmental Services ) ) ) ) ) ____________________________________) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the parties desire to settle in an amicable manner all claims which have arisen
lv] Yes [ No Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(1). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name AFSCME 19. Council 93 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Robert Van Campen, Esq. (617) 367-6026 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21.
Srednicki: The Charging Party United Public Service Employees Union, Local 424M (the Union) and the Respondent Town of Wilbraham (the Town) have entered into a Settlement Agreement, dated February 15, 2018, over the allegations set forth in the Unions Charge of Prohibited Practice in the above-captioned matter (DLR Case No. MUP-17-6372).
Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (1), Employee Organization (0), Employer (E): 40. Name United Public Service Employees Union, Local 424M 41. Representative to |contact Lan T.
In regard to this particular appeal, DOC, while still maintaining there was no bypass in this particular case, offered to engage in settlement discussions to forego the need for a full hearing before the Commission. Subsequent to the pre-hearing conference, DOC forwarded a settlement offer to the Commission, which was copied to the Appellant, on March 13, 2006.
08/21/2012 07:42 FAX MAINT 16177046759 [4] 902/003 DEPT The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Labor Relations In the Matter of Steve Francette, Charging Party and Jail Officers and Employees Association of Suffolk County, Respondent SUPL-11-1287 Settlement Agreement In settlement of the charges filed in this matter by Mr. Francette against the JOEASC, the parties agree as follows: 1. JOEASC has paid Mr.
RYAN DISTRICT ATTORNEY ________________________________ Assistant District Attorney Date: SETTLEMENT/LAST CHANCE AGREEMENT The City of Woburn ("City") and John J. Donnelly, Jr. ("Donnelly"), agree to the following terms: WHEREAS, Donnelly was appointed by the City of Woburn to the position of Reserve Police Officer on March 18, 2015; and made a Full-Time Reserve on October 16, 2017.
On or about September 16, 2019 and continuing through October 3, 2019, Securitas employees began performing parking ambassador 3 Neither party produced a copy of the settlement agreement. Neither party indicated whether the unions representing the ISOs or the AFTMaintainers were parties to the 2018 settlement agreement. 4 5 Securitas was not a party to the 2018 settlement agreement.
Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. | INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (0), Employer jO (E): 40. Name 41.
Eustace, Kimberly (DLR) From: Sent: Gary Wednesday, February 13, 2019 2:14 PM To: Eustace, Kimberly (DLR) Ce: Subject: Comcast; Gayle; Demarco, Shirley (DLR) Re: Several Pending Dracut Matters.Report of Settlements Kim - just following up on the email below - wanted to confirm that your office was aware that these matters, scheduled for tomorrow, have been settled.
Yes LI No parties are still at the main table for a successor CBA - no settlement reached on any issues Note: The OLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by | the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(1). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Representative to contact NEPBA Locals 4A & 4B 19. 120. Telephone Number Gary G.
In Paragraph 3 of the Unions Addendum to Charge they cite a 2012 matter heard before this agency resulting in a settlement agreement which is attached thereto. Said agreement is undated and unsigned having no legal force or effect. 4.
In this case, the Appellants employment history with Norwood created red-flags, because of the settlement agreement, the sixty (60) day suspension and enrollment in the anger management program. Such red flags led to a discretionary interview of the Appellant. Not all candidates are granted discretionary interviews. (Testimony of Janeen Mitchell; Exhibit 4; Exhibit 31) 8.