Chief Callahan also solicited reports from the responding officers and ordered Lieutenant Maria LaVita to conduct an internal affairs investigation. Lieutenant LaVita found that Mr. Griffin had committed five specific instances of misconduct in connection with the incident: operating to endanger; failure to file an accident report; failure to take Police Action; insubordination (violating quarantine); and untruthfulness.

The report was forwarded to Deputy Chief of Internal Affairs Paul Oxford (hereinafter Oxford) on June 15, 2007, Chief John McLaughlin (hereinafter McLaughlin) of the Office of Investigative Services on June 19, 2007 and Alex Fox (hereinafter Fox), the Director of Affirmative Action for the DO on July 23, 2007. 28.

Rule 9.18, Cooperation with Internal Affairs Investigation 6. Rule 9.19, Withholding Evidence; 7. Rules 9.20, Testifying at Investigation; and 8. G.L. c. 268A, 23(b)(2). (Exhibits 1, 2 and 7) The specific allegations levied by the Town against the Appellant are found in Section 41. The Hearing Officers Report and Recommendation and state as follows: 1.

DOC introduced sixteen exhibits into evidence and called as witnesses Investigator Nicholas Green (CO Green) of the Internal Affairs Unit, who conducted the DOC investigation following the plaintiffs arrest, as well as Officer Jason Wheeler of the Easton Police Department (Officer Wheeler) and Massachusetts State Trooper Conor Flynn (Trooper Flynn), who both responded to the scene following the plaintiffs wifes 911 call.

If t he Appellant did not exercise either option by December 1, 2021, an internal affairs investigation would be initiated against the Appellant. (Motion to Dismiss) 5. When the Appellant did not resign, after a duty status hearing held pursuant to G.L. c. 22C, 13, the MSP imposed a 60-day administrative suspension without pay on the Appellant. (Opposition) 6.

The CERB has also entertained such claims relating to a unions enforcement of its internal rules in circumstances where a unions freedom to regulate its internal affairs potentially conflicts with certain overriding interests implicit in See, e.g., Johnson and McNulty, 8 MLC 1993, MUPL-2049, MUPL-2050 the Law. (March 23, 1982) affd sub nom. Boston Police Patrolmens Association v. Labor Relations Commission, 16 Mass. App.

right under the Unions by-laws to appeal the denial of arbitration to the Executive The Commonwealth Employment Relations Board (CERB) will not Board. interfere with union rules or actions that are within the legitimate domain of internal union affairs, National Association of Government Employees, 13 MLC 1525, 1526, SUPL-2343, SUPL-2344, SUPL-2345, SUPL-2347 (March 12, Dismissal (cont'd) MUPL-18-6425 1987), although a unions freedom to regulate its internal

The City assigned Captain Murphy as the internal affairs investigator for Stocks case. Captain Murphy testified that he was present at the May 29, 2012 hearing; that it was his job to monitor all of Stocks court hearings on behalf of the City; and that it was his responsibility to report back to the City what had transpired during those hearings.

The City assigned Captain Murphy as the internal affairs investigator for Stocks case. Captain Murphy testified that he was present at the May 29, 2012 hearing; that it was his job to monitor all of Stocks court hearings on behalf of the City; and that it was his responsibility to report back to the City what had transpired during those hearings.

In response to Aiellos email, Conley directed Assistant Police Chief Joseph Fitzgerald to conduct an internal affairs investigation. Upon the conclusion of that investigation, Fitzgerald determined that Aiello had violated the GPDs Rules and Regulations namely, the Core Value of Professionalism, Rule 6.3.10 (Insubordination), Rule 6.7.6 (Discourtesy), and Rule 6.7.24 (Public Statements).

These charges included five (5) charges of onduty misconduct: Charge #1 on-duty sexual misconduct; Charge #4 & Charge #5 assault and battery and unauthorized use of Taser; Charge #9 Unauthorized use of CJIS system; and Charge #10 Untruthfulness during internal affairs interview.

At or around 3:19 A.M., DB and AA went to the District 7 Boston police station to report what had happened. (Exhibit 4 and Testimony of AA) 35. The Boston police officer who completed the incident report wrote in part that he could observe a large bump on [DB]s forehead which he [DB] states was caused by the punch from the suspect.