DEGRENIER PROPERTY - PREPARE SETTLEMENT STATEMENT; PREPARE FOR CLOSING. DEGRENIER PROPERTY - TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH TAX COLLECTOR RE: TAXES OWED; PREPARE CLOSING DOCUMENTS AND EXCHANGE E-MAILS WITH SELLER'S ATTORNEY RE: SAME; PREPARE FOR CLOSING, DEGRENIER PROPERTY - TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF MARINE AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS AND SELLER'S ATTORNEY RE: CLOSING DOCUMENTATION; PREPARE FOR CLOSING.
DISCUSSIONS; DRAFT RESPONSE TO E-MAIL FROM UNION OPPOSING COUNSEL; REVIEW EXPIRED CONTRACT COMPENSATION FIGURES; ANALYZE COST OF LIVING INCREASES AS AWARDED IN ARBITRATION DECISION; REVIEW E-MAIL FROM HEARING OFFICER WITH AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING; DRAFT E-MAIL TO ASSISTANT TOWN MANAGER RE: ; TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH UNION OPPOSING COUNSEL AS TO PRIOR ARBITRATION AWARD AND SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS. 2.00 450.00 02/13/2020 BMM TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH
TL R NTA LE This Settlement Agreement and Release of all Claims (hereinafter Agreement) is made and entered into as of August , 2017 by and between Cynthia Snow (Snow) and Town of Plymouth (Town).
Plymouth, Mass. 02360 RE: Records Request 2019-0469 Emily Clark, Enclosed please find documents responsive to your request for public records that relate to the settlement in the case of Cynthia Snow v. Town of Plymouth.
Brief Comment (If needed) Bank of America ; supports card a ss la: es Satie ee presnt = Pa including Dee ee processing, and 2 authorization : settlement.
Big Tobacco Master Settlement Donna Sakkinen Information about being able to receive payments from the Tobacco MSA, is it David Bradeen possible or a scam?
North would take a settlement discussion forward to the Board was if the settlement offer was substantial. An offer was made on Officer Quiltys behalf for a 15 to 30 day unpaid suspension.
The reopener would be if he is arraigned on criminal charges arising out of his alleged conduct, then the Board has the discretion to decide to reopen the settlement negotiations and may seek additional discipline. Officer Quilty will retain his rights to either agree to or challenge that additional discipline. In practicality that means in a settlement agreement, the Board would not release all its claims.
Spatafore suggested that in this case a reasonable settlement may be in the $50,000-$75,000 range. Ms. Spatafore also noted that Ms. DiClementes attorney explained that his client is in touch with the District Attorneys office potentially pursuing a criminal charge. Tonight, Ms. Spatafore is seeking to determine the Boards interest in pursuing non-binding mediation, and some range of settlement.
Attorney Simms asks whether proceeding with the settlement conference is futile? Two persons will need to be delegated to attend the settlement conference (a representative from the planning board and a representative from the Select Board); both will need to have authority to make financial decisions as well.
Town of Natick and Settlement Agreement: $5,625.00 offer was made by the Union, along with waiving all claims for others under the PEC Agreement. The Release will be a mutual release. There is no downside to doing a Mutual Release at this point. Mr. Rooney wants permission to agree to those terms and then the final release will be executed. Mr. Hickey said that he considers the lawsuit to be frivolous. Mr.
Pursuant to M.G.L. c. 30A, section 21(a)(3), to discuss strategy with respect to litigation if an open meeting may have a detrimental effect on the litigating position of the public body and the chair so declares NEPBA Substantial edits have been received from the attorney for the Union on the Quilty matter regarding the Settlement Agreement. The Agreement is between the Union, Officer Quilty and the Town. C.
Millette stated that a draft Settlement/Last Chance Agreement had been sent to counsel for Officer Quilty for review and feedback. A Board member inquired as to whether or not this agreement was very different from an agreement used in the past. Ms. Millette stated that it was not substantively different. Chair Freedman inquired about putting this item back on the agenda for December 30, 2020, but Ms.
Framingham Public Schools , Hampshire Superior Court, Civil Action No. 1680CV00074, With regard to your request regarding settlements, the Jackson case settled in 2018 with Durham School Services, LP paying $6,250 on the Citys behalf. The Guild case was dismissed without any settlement payment involved. The Saviatto matter settled in 2018 with the City agreeing to pay $59,750.
Upon delivery of settlement funds in accordance with paragraph XI, RELEASORS will promptly file all documents and promptly take any other action necessary or appropriate to terminate the Civil Action against the RELEASEES.
BOARD MEMBER RE: THIRD DAY OF HEARING. 2.20 495.00 01/08/2021 BMM REVIEW HEARING MATERIALS; BEGIN DRAFT OUTLINE OF CROSS-EXAMINATION OF WITNESS FOR NEXT DAY OF HEARING. 1.60 360.00 01/11/2021 BMM TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH SELECT BOARD MEMBER RE: STATUS OF HEARING. 0.80 180.00 01/13/2021 BMM REVIEW NOTES FROM THIRD DAY OF HEARING; PREPARE FOR FOURTH DAY. 0.70 157.50 01/15/2021 BMM REVIEW AND RESPOND TO E-MAIL FROM MEDIATOR RE: CONTACT TO DISCUSS SETTLEMENT