. > Shea appealed, and a divided panel of the respondent Civil Service Commission (CSC) reversed that ruling. HRD has filed a petition pursuant to G.L. . 304 which secks judicial review of the CSC s ruling in Sheas case. Pending the resolution of its appeal, HRD has filed a motion / Ve be FILES 76 ee ( "y td) which sceks to slay the enforcement of the CSC ruling in Sheas favor.

The Board postponed taking any action on May-Staffords request until it could receive further counsel from both the Civil Service Commission/Human Resources Division and its own legal counsel. On or about June 5, 2012, the Board met again in executive session with May- Stafford, who continued to hold the rank of Chief and was outside the bargaining unit. May-Stafford again requested that she be allowed to step down from the position of Chief.

The City agrees that a change in title only, pursuant to a decision of the State Hum: Resources Division or the Civil Service Commission, of any job classification set for in the Appendix attached hereto, shall not affect the inclusion of that job classificatic in the bargaining unit. .

No matter within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Civil Service Commission, Board of Selectmen, Chief of Police or of any Retirement Board established by law shall be subject to grievance hereunder except as in Section 4 of this Article.

Roca (Roca), seeks review, pursuant to G.L. c. 30A, 14 and G.L. c. 31, 44, of a decision by the defendant, the Civil Service Commission (Commission), to affirm the defendants, the City of Holyoke (City), decision to terminate his employment as a police officer in the Holyoke Police Department (HPD). Before the court are the parties cross Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings.

Hearing(s) before the Civil Service Commission addressing the matters raised in the Complaint were adjudicated and deferral to the Decision(s) of Civil Service Commission and dismissal of the Complaint are appropriate; K. The Board lacks subject matter and/or personal jurisdiction over the Parties and/or the charges made in the Complaint; L.

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place, Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 MICHAEL SUAREZ, Appellant v. Docket No.: D-08-5 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Respondent Attorney for the Appellant: Stephen C. Pfaff, Atty. Louison, Costello, Condon & Pfaff, LLP 65 Batterymarch Street Boston, MA 02110 Attorney for the Respondent: Earl Wilson, Atty. Senior Labor Relations Specialist Department of Correction P.O.

Nothing in the Agreement shall diminish the authority and power of the Civil Service Commission, the Retirement Board or the Personnel Board. In the event that any part or provisions of this Agreement is in conflict with any law or By-Law, such law or By-Law shall prevail so long as such conflict remains.

ARTICLE V Arbitration If any grievance alleging a violation of the Contract or concerning the application, meaning or interpretation of the Agreement and which said grievance is not a matter suitable for submission to the Civil Service Commission, and remains unsettled after Step 2, either party may, within sixty (60) days after the reply from the Mayor of his representative is due, request arbitration of the matter by written notice to the other

Section 5 Notwithstanding any provision of the Agreement to the contrary, any matter which is subject to the jurisdiction of the Civil Service Commission shall not be a subject of grievance or arbitration under this Agreement, unless, the employee and the Union elect grievance/arbitration as the exclusive remedy pursuant to Section 8 of General Laws, Chapter 150E, in cases involving suspension, dismissal, removal or termination of employees who have