CIVIL SERVICECOMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 ANTHONY GRASSO and JOHN MOCCIO, Appellants v. D1-16-175 (GRASSO) D1-16-176 (MOCCIO) TOWN OF AGAWAM, Respondent Appearance for Appellants: John D. Connor, Esq. Connor & Morneau LLP 273 State Street, Second Floor Springfield, MA 01103 Appearance for Respondent: Russell Dupere, Esq.
The Union effectively represented Parow at her Civil ServiceCommission hearing regarding the layoff proceedings. On or about June 27, 2014, all custodians received notice that the layoff notices were rescinded. The Union did not allow Parow to attend Union meetings on July 19, 2014 and August 2, 2014. Neither Union meeting pertained to contract proposals or ratification.
On October 14, 2008, the plaintiff appealed her removal to the Civil ServiceCommission (commission), arguing that she did not resign.1 1 During the previous twelve months the plaintiff had filed two grievance letters with her union relating to an increase in Almost three years later, on April 21, 2011, the commission issued its decision in which it found that the plaintiff did not resign, that the city failed to comply with procedural requirements
RLA~ AAG MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS The Boston Police Department (BPD) moves for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to G.L.c. 30A, 14, requesting reversal of a decision by the Massachusetts Civil ServiceCommission (Commission) to grant certain relief to defendant Gary Lee.
After reviewing the administrative record, the relevant law, and the parties submissions, the plaintiff s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is ALLOWED and the defendants Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED. ' Massachusetts Civil Service Commission 4 BACKGROUND Tn June 2006, Savickas name appeared on an eligibility list for employment with the Boston Police Department.
MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICECOMMISSION & another MEMORANDUM Notice J. $ R C. G A M. OF DECISION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFRS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS This is an action for judicial review pursuant to G.
Attorney Brunelli also questioned Detective Lieutenant 2 Adams also appealed to the Civil ServiceCommission. However, it does not have jurisdiction over appeals made by State Troopers from decisions from the Duty Status Board or from Section 43 Hearings. See Perez v. Department of State Police, 491 Mass. 474, 481-82 (2023).
In its December 18th response to Attorney Kittredge, an attorney for the City states the following: In your public records requests, you request documents that I believe, in good faith, relate directly to your clients ongoing appeal before the Civil ServiceCommission. On multiple occasions you were sent emails asking to clarify if this was the case. The City never received a response.
In the event that the dispute involves a matter under the jurisdiction of the Civil ServiceCommission, the Association may choose to pursue the matter with the Civil Service Commission instead of the American Arbitration Association.