Having thus jointly reaffirmed the superior and preemptive jurisdiction of the Civil Service statute, Procedures, Regulation as applied, and decided, interpreted and enforced by the Civil Service Commission, the parties to this Agreement, do hereby also express their joint intention and agreement that such matters which are normally within the jurisdiction of, and have been traditionally reserved, in whole or in part, for final and binding determination

An employee who is dismissed, suspended or otherwise disciplined by any other form of adverse personnel action which is within the jurisdiction of the Massachusetts Civil Service Commission may not simultaneously challenge such action before both the Civil Service Commission and the American Arbitration Association.

Service Commission or any court or agency of competent jurisdiction as provided thereunder, and any and all rights to proceed under the grievance procedure set forth been to have 1.6 shall be deemed in Section and, waived provided further, the condition or event upon which such request, complaint, or by the petition be not thereafter shall is based the subject of any Association or the employee to be determined under Section 1.6. grievance If any

At the had served Civil Service Commission file brief appear or as of a a in : | decision for < oN ~ 1:28 a j q Se pleadings the failing differed Desmond's February, Service party to that by erred findings against Background. a concluding its where punishment, Desmond by (2) from Commission appeal, discipline, his appeals Bridgewater On erred (1) commission modify town. the of favor RULE 2 nN) another.!

Notwithstanding any provisions of this Agreement, any matter, which is subject to the jurisdiction of the Civil Service Commission, arbitration hereunder. or any Retirement Board established by law, shall ntot be subject of Any employee who is required to appear before any state or federal agency, board or commission relative to a matter which is of direct interest to the WHA shall not be subject to any loss of pay becuase of such appearance.

Failure to follow all the provisions of DPD Policy and Procedure 200 (Internal Affairs) Massachusetts Civil Service Commission decision dated November 8, 2018 Outcome (Founded/Unfounded, Recognition, Corrective, etc.) Letter of Reprimand and attached rebuttal EMPLOYEE NAME: Coleman, Zach TITLE: Patrolman Date 3-11-18 Incident Description (Complaint, Personnel Records Entry, etc.)

MUP-19-7419 hearings, hearings including scheduled mediation through Arbitration Association: 3 officers: Hearings before the Chief of Police and/or the American and/or Mayor relating to disciplinary matters: 3 officers: Hearings before the Civil Service Commission: 3 officers; 5. 6.

The filing of a grievance by n of employee contesting any discipline or discharge shall constitute an electio ee remedies which will automatically bar the filing of an appeal by such employ Board to the Civil Service Commission under Chapter 31, or to the Retirement under Chapter 71, dealing with the same matter.

Hearings before the Massachusetts Civil Service Commission: 3 officers; 5. Hearings before the Massachusetts Labor Relations Commission: 3 officers; 6. Meetings in preparation for item numbers 1 through 5 above and bimonthly meetings of the Union's Executive Board: not more than 4 officers; 7.

The Massachusetts Civil Service Commission's role was primarily to adjudicate the dispute between the parties, is a nominal party here and has indicated that it will not otherwise participate any further in this matter. (See: docket entry no. 17). . . 3:58PM Feb.17. 2010 Practitioner BPD's Division who conducting a medical review psychological screening components physical recruit was and application process.

MASSACHUSETTS MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER f RE: PLAINTIFF, CITY OF METHUEN'S MOTION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION'S DECISION GRANTING DEFENDANT, JOSEPH SOLOMON, RELIEF . On _. or about May 7, ("Solomon") was discharged by the Mayor Methuen as Chief of of the Methuen a service civil Solomon 2008, defendant Police Joseph of appealed Commissioner reduced twelve of.

.* AND ORDER PURSUANT MEMORANDUM Maynard police department, Superior Court reversing decision finding 1. following The undisputed facts. of and zoom" preset hired Rego noticed police cameras locations. dispatch, the a As patrolman with the judgment of the a from Civil Service Commission (commission) wrongfully terminated.