BOSTON 1 Civil COURT 2018 COMMONWEALTH OF MASS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION leave.? MASSACHUSETTS APPEALS RECEIVED AUG1O OF on notice of his termination authority hearing concluded that on hearing.?

However, on or about June 25, 2015 Civil Service Commission Chairman Christopher Bowman ordered the dismissal of the appeal of the Grievant, Jerry Santiago. (Jt Ex 8). The parties then stipulated that the thirty (30) day suspension would be referred to the Department of Labor Relations and held before the Arbitrator and that the case would then be allowed to proceed on the merits.

However, on or about June 25, 2015 Civil Service Commission Chairman Christopher Bowman ordered the dismissal of the appeal of the Grievant, Jerry Santiago. (Jt Ex 8). The parties then stipulated that the thirty (30) day suspension would be referred to the Department of Labor Relations and held before the Arbitrator and that the case would then be allowed to proceed on the merits.

However, on or about June 25, 2015 Civil Service Commission Chairman Christopher Bowman ordered the dismissal of the appeal of the Grievant, Jerry Santiago. (Jt Ex 8). The parties then stipulated that the thirty (30) day suspension would be referred to the Department of Labor Relations and held before the Arbitrator and that the case would then be allowed to proceed on the merits.

completed form: WAIVER OF RIGHT TO APPEAL DISCIPLINARY ACTION I wish to submit the attached grievance under Article 23, Grievance Procedure and Article 22, Arbitration of Disciplinary Action, appealing my demotion, suspension or discharge effective on and pursuant to Article 22, Section 4 of the Agreement between the NAGE and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts dated and all rights to appeal this disciplinary action to any other forum including the Civil

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place - Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 BRIAN SWEET, Appellant v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE, Respondent CASE NO: D1-10-290 Appellants Representative: ` Joseph P. Kitredge, Esq. Rafanelli & Kittredge, P.C. 1 Keefe Road Acton, MA 01720 Respondents Representative: Michael B. Halpin Esq.

Sheehan and Donovan each filed appeals with the Civil Service Commission. Both appeals were denied. The Town denies that it has a practice of promoting the most senior employee when the list is exhausted and contends, rather, that it promotes the most qualified employee regardless of seniority. The Town produced a chart which shows that, since 2009, there have been 23 provisional appointments made to lieutenant, captain and deputy chief.

The second and third most senior Firefighters challenged the promotions to the Civil Service Commission (CSC).The CSC dismissed their complaints. The Union filed MUP-16-5571 on October 20, 2016. The Town did not file a response. An inperson investigation was held on December 15, 2016.1 However, on December 2, 2016 the Town again made provisional promotions for two Lieutenant positions, and again did not make those promotions based on seniority.

The Town bypassed Banas on the promotional list, and Banas subsequently filed an appeal with the Civil Service Commission (Commission). Ultimately, Banas prevailed and was promoted to the position of captain. Complaint and Partial Dismissal (contd.) | MUP-17-5876 Between 2013 and April of 2017, Banas, as Union President, represented the Union in negotiations with the Chief on various issues.

) Decision mailed: | | S110 Civil Service Commission. COMMONWEALTH CIVIL SUFFOLK, ss. OF MASSACHUSETTS SERVICE ( COMMISSION One Ashburton Place - Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 LISA TOMASHPOL, Appellant v. CHELSEA SOLDIERS HOME, Respondents CASE NO: D1-09-188 Appellants Attorney: Michael F, Manning, Esq. Counsel NAGE 159 Burgin Parkway Quincy, MA 02169 Appointing Authoritys Attorney: Lidia Rincon, Esq.

Decision mailed: Civil Service IZh b 1 issi : Commission Ke CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 PAUL MENDONCA, Appellant Case No. D1-08-94 y. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF LABOR & WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, Respondent Attorneys for the Appellant: Larry C. OBryan, Esq. Galen Gilbert, Esq. Gilbert & OBryan, LLP 295 Washington Street, Suite 351 Boston, MA 02108 Attorney for the Respondent: Michael E.

In 2013, following 18 days of evidentiary hearings, the Civil Service Commission (the Commission) issued a 134-page decision which upheld BPDs termination of four of the ten officers, but determined that BPD lacked just cause to terminate Plaintiffs. The Commission ordered that the Plaintiffs be reinstated with retroactive compensation and benefits as of October 21,2010.