Search help (advanced operators, examples)
Learn more
Tags
Agencies
Show All
Displaying items 271-280 of 8624 in total
Department of Labor Relations Cases
Classified Staff Union, MTA/NEA / University of Massaschusetts
3 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
One of the agreements cited pertains to a contract settlement with the Commonwealth where funds were appropriated in advance of the settlement of this contract. This agreement enjoyed a status that was in accord with Secretarys Shors statements. The University by contrast, remained without any bargaining reserves in contradiction to Secretary Shors statements.
Charging party has asserted that the specific reserve established by St. 2015, c. 10 for the University is intended for future bargaining settlements and is independent of the legislative validation created by section 65. The reserve established by section 2 line item 1599-4299 provides a partial reserve for the University of $2.2 million for agreements that have not yet been ratified by the general court.
Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(1). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name Classified and Technical Union/MTA/NEA 19. 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Matthew D. Jones, Esq. (617) 878-8283 21.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
BOSTON POLICE SUPERIOR OFFICERS FED. / BOSTON, CITY OF
18 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT HAS NO RELATION TO THE RIGHT OF ASSIGNMENT OR ANY OTHER NON-DELEGABLE RIGHTS . 25 ARGUMENT . . . A, The 2005 Settlement Agreement Establishes That Certain Work Belongs to the Federations' Bargaining 26 Unit B. The 2005 Settlement Agreement Does Not Relate to the Level of Services Offered By the City . 30 C. The 2005 Settlement Agreement Does Not Relate to ths Deployment of Police Of . 33 IV.
Since the settlement agreement does not involve any work ever performed by a SENA bargaining unit member, the Citys arguments regarding SENA are irrelevant. Second, as to the Detectives, there has been no finding by the Hearing Officer that the work at issue in this case is the exclusive work of the Detectives.
THE JULY 19, 2005 SETTLEMENT, LIEUTENANT LINSKEYS 2006 PROMOTION AND THE MUNICIPAL POLICE REORGANIZATION 30.
The parties resolved the complaint in MUP-04-4191 through a settlement agreement signed on or about July 19, 2005. [Jt. Ex. 21; Jt. Ex. 1.]
Whether discretion the in its CERB the language the of Boston circumstances. arbitrary decision enforced City was of the and 2005 (hereinafter, its and capricious remedy settlement the City) when or it abused strictly agreement against under of all the STATEMENT In this 11 and order of M.G.L. c. the CERB Officers that matter, 30A on Exhibit 1, or into On entered a a from favor about July 19, a settlement settlement page 2005, In alieged the that that
First, she found that the City unlawfully repudiated a July 19, 2005 Settlement Agreement requiring, inter alia, that an held assignment in the Special Police Unit (SPU) that then Sergeant Detective Danie] Linskey from April 17, 2004 to April 12, 2006 (Stipulated Facts J 19), would revert to the Federation upon Linskeys voluntary or involuntary departure from such assignment.
MUP-04-4191 through a settlement agreement signed on or about July 19, 2005. 22. On December 4, 1996, Hearing Officer Susan Atwater determined that the City had violated the BPPAs 150E rights by expanding the jurisdiction of the Boston Municipal Police to include Bostons public housing developments through the MOU. Boston v. BPPA, [23 MLC 133] (1996).
. - Representing the Boston Police Superior Officers Federation DECISION ON APPEAL OF HEARING OFFICER DECISION On September 12, 2011, a duly-designated (Department) hearing officer issued a decision in this matter.' that the City of Boston (City) repudiated of Labor Department Relations The hearing officer held a settlement agreement (2005 Agreement) between the City and the Boston Police Superior Officers Federation (Union) but did not unlawfully
After the parties executed the April 29, 2003 settlement agreement, Doe secured new employment in slightly less than one and ono-half years.
Through a settlement And you can tell me agreement. how that settlement agreement about? GILLESPIE: which City 2010 was GILLESPIE: came v Yes. And POOLE: 20, Federation Yes. OK. POOLE: July Thats GILLESPIE: POOLE: Officers It took is an into bargained all-encompassing account back and a forth settlement agreement cases were number of with City the and that the Commissioner.
While paragraph 2 of the settlement agreement in MUP-04-4191 refers to the assignment of Commander, Special Police Division, the Federations written submission in this matter refers to a second-in-command assignment. See Unions Written Submission, paragraphs 5, 6, 7, 8, and 13. According to the ordinary meaning of the terms, the second-in-command is not the commander. 14.
. | | i I The City Hall Security Assignment Was Never_a Captains Position and the Work Did not Belong to the Federation Exclusively Prior to the 2005 Settlement Agreement, The Linskey underlying case concerned the assignment to City Hall Security from April of Sergeant 17, 2004 to April Detective 12, 2006.
Commonwealth Relations Employment Board, Motion for Now Board it Leave comes (Board) leave brief to in the therefor, the question of The No. to File a Brief a of the Court Law in the Commonwealth and moves file a Lieu of this Honorable memorandum Board is of subject of the by the 30, 2012 Board affirmation Labor Relations (DLR) Hearing held that the settlement and the City agreement Boston of Boston (2005 Police violation of a Officer Superior of
STATEMENT OF THE CASE On May 24, 2006, the Union filed a charge of prohibited practice with the former Labor Relations Commission, now known as the Department of Labor Relations (DLR), alleging that the City had violated Section 10(a)(5) and, derivatively, Section 10(a)(1) of the Law by repudiating the terms of a settlement agreement dated July 19, 2005 (2005 Agreement) and by transferring bargaining unit work to non-bargaining unit personnel.
. - Representing the Boston Police Superior ' Officers' Federation Qt$, jjalipilEPPSF H arr 1 m_ .rt DEQIsION On September 12, 2011, a duly-designated Department of Labor Relations 2 (Department) hearing officer issued a decision In this motter. 1 The hearing officer held 3 that the Cy of Boston (City) repudiated a settlement agreement (2005 Agreement) . 4 between the City and the Boston Police Superior Offloers' Federation (Union) but did 5 not unlawfully
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Busch, Matthew v. Town of Whitman 6/17/21
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
The Towns decision to rescind the appointment, or offer, was the result of a settlement agreement between the Town and the two candidates who were tied for first on the certification, both of whom filed bypass appeals with the Commission which were effectively withdrawn after the settlement agreement between the parties was reached.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
Salaried Employees of No. America, Local 9158 / Boston, City of
6 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
CHARGING PARTYS PROSPECTIVE WITNESSES (1) John DeStefano, SENA Vice President, will testify about the Unions decision to file a charge in MUP-15-4969 and the resulting settlement agreement. If necessary, Mr.
On February 1, 2016, the parties engaged in mediation and reached a settlement agreement redistributing the contested work to SENA members. [See Memorandum of Agreement dated February 1, 2016, attached.] In or around February, 2016, SENA learned that the City allowed, and continues to allow, the non-unit manager to continue performing these SENA duties.
The parties are expected to bring to the mediation individuals with settlement authority, or if that is impossible to have those with settlement authority available by telephone that day. Under no circumstances will mediation delay the scheduled Expedited Hearing date.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Forrest, Lauren v. Weymouth Fire Department 9/3/15
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
Prior to the hearing, the parties entered into settlement negotiations regarding various matters, including resolution of the disciplinary matter which was to be the subject of the Town disciplinary hearing that day.4 (Testimonies of Davis, Coughlin, and Forrest) 6. The Town was represented by counsel at the settlement negotiations, which lasted at least a couple of hours. Ms.
Open Meeting Law Determinations
DETERMINATION - 3/2/2021 - OML 2021-23 - GREAT BARRINGTON BOARD OF SELECTMEN
1 document · · Attorney General's Office · No Violation
At the outset, it is important to note that this decision is the result of an investigation solely into whether the Board violated the Open Meeting Law, and has no bearing on the merits of the Housatonic Rest of River Settlement Agreement or whether it is good policy, issues which underlie the complaints. 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all dates in this letter refer to the year 2020. Ms.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
Somerville Police Employees Association / Somerville, City of
2 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
On November 17, 2015, Collins responded to the letter by email indicating that, based on the Unions letter, it appeared that the Union was willing to consider a reasonable settlement offer resolving the matter. Collins indicated that he had spoken with Fallon and hoped to have a settlement offer to present the Union. 9.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
National Association of Government Employees / Comm. of Mass/Commr. of Admin. & Finance
2 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
The parties entered a settlement agreement on September 6, 2018. The settlement was between the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (DCR) and NAGE, Unit 3, regarding the termination of NAGE member Andrew Ohlson. As part of said Settlement the Commonwealth of Massachusetts was to pay Mr. Ohlson a lump sum of seven thousand and five hundred dollars ($7,500).
Department of Labor Relations Cases
Needham Education Association / Needham School Committee
3 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
On August 22, 2018, AD, the Union and Superintendent of Needham Public Schools Daniel Gutekanst, signed a settlement agreement. Contemporaneous with the execution of the settlement agreement, AD submitted an irrevocable letter of resignation.
Or or around June 1, 2019 the employer violated Section 10(a)(5) and derivatively (a)(1) by repudiating a settlement agreement between it and the union. Specifically, a bargaining unit member resigned under the provisions of a settlement agreement to which the union was a signatory. The settlement agreement included a provision providing for a neutral reference for the outgoing employee.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
Somerville, City of / Somerville Police Employees Association
3 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
The Employer acknowledged during investigation that the purpose of the request was to prepare for arbitration and to use the information to guide potential settlement discussions, should the information suggest settlement was in the Employers best interest.
Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (0, Employee Organization (0), Employer , E. {E): 40. Name _ City of Somerville __ 41. Representative to contact 42.
As any litigator knows, cases are often evaluated for settlement even on the doorstep of trial or arbitration. Most notably the NLRB made clear in California Nurses that even in a pre-arbitration setting the furnishing of information is required so that the parties to the grievance procedure have the opportunity to evaluate the merits of the claim and work towards settlement. Id. at 1366- 1367.
Displaying items 271-280 of 8624 in total