There was also an Internal Affairs Investigation. (Exhibits 14 and 16) 12. The Supply Section was responsible for the maintenance and delivery of supplies and inventory. As a supply officer, the Appellants duties included uniform categorizing and distribution, ordering of equipment, general maintenance of grounds, grass cutting, and building maintenance. (Testimony of Deputy Director Arduini) 13.
Almeida also learned from the Departments Internal Affairs Department (IAD) that it was likely that Ms. DePina used the Departments in-house criminal history record information system to conduct searches for current and past boyfriends. Ms. DePina also conducted a search of past romantic partners of Mr. J. (Testimony of Det. Almeida) 39. Det.
Decision (Contd) SUP-19-7297 1 referenced information is necessary and relevant for it to determine: 1) the extent of the 2 employers surveillance of bargaining unit members, 2) changes in working conditions 3 that would require bargaining as a result of the investigation, 3) changes to the way pre- 4 disciplinary matters were handled, 4) any new and continuing methods of employee 5 review, 5) if there were changes to the internal affairs investigation
Determining if there was a change in the internal affairs investigation procedures; i. Investigating if any rights of members of the bargaining unit were violated; j. Determining if workplace harassment had occurred; k. Determining if bargaining unit members right to privacy had been violated; l. Determining the Unions bargaining position relative to the use of technology and surveillance technology in the MEP department; m.
In a subsequent internal affairs investigation by the PPD, 4 Capt. Flynn reiterated his belief that the Appellant should not be promoted to Captain. Capt. Flynn was less concerned about 4 In May 2021, the Appellant filed an internal affairs complaint against Lt. Higgins, Capt. Manuel, and Capt. Flynn, alleging that they improperly interfered with his promotional opportunity.
Primary Records Access Officer City of Boston 1 City Hall Square, Room 615 Boston, MA 02201 Dear Attorney Williams: I have received the petition of an unnamed Records Requestor appealing the response of the Boston Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1).
City of Boston Police CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, James W. Simpson, Jr., certify that on the 22" day,of March 2017, I served the foregoing on the charging party via first class mail and electronic mail. James-W~ Simpson, Jr. EXHIBITA Organizational Chart Chet of the Revere Police Department Executive Officer Administrative [ I I I I Training Human Resources Accreditation Foley ene. Nea, !
City of Boston Police Department. 15-02233, March 2, 2017, Suffolk Superior Court. 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, James W. Simpson, Jr., certify that on the 22nd day of March 2017,1 served the foregoing on the charging party via first class mail and electronic mail. James-WTSimpson, Jr.
Further, when examining the public status of the identities of police officers interviewed by the Internal Affairs Division (lAD) of the City of Boston Police Department, the Court found that "[n]or is there sufficient basis under the privacy exemption to withhold the identities of the police officers interviewed by lAD investigators." Globe Newspaper Co. v. Police Comm'r, 419 Mass. 852, 864 (1995). Brian Maser, Esq.
BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT Respondent Ms. Jill Kavaleski, Appellant: pro se Sheila B. Gallagher, Atty. Office of the Legal Advisor Boston Police Department One Schroeder Plaza Appointing Authority: Boston, MA 02120 (617) 343-4550 Daniel M.
the Commission applied a balancing test between a union's right to regulate its internal affairs by expulsion, suspension or fines and certain overriding public interests implicit in the Law. Id. at 1526. In applying this test, the Commission explicitly looked for guidance to the developing law under the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA). Id. at 1527.
See Boston Police Superior Officers Federation v. Labor Relations Commission, 410 Mass. 890, 575 N.E.2d 131 (1991). The Commissions regulation (456 C.MLR. 15.03) is designed to prevent litigation of stale claims. Miller v. Labor Relations Commission, 33 Mass.App.Ct. 404, 408 (1992).