Clean Energy Design Group, Inc. 1095.85 Goldman Sachs Renewable Power Operating Company 303.6 Berkshire County Sheriffs Office 152.75 Holden Municipal Light Department 145.7 Waltham Lumber Co 498.7 Conergy, Inc. 443.085 Mashpee Commons 172.38 Reardon Realty MA, Inc. 150.93 RIN Logistics 2932.65 AMERESCO 154.44 RIN Logistics 600.075 Navisun LLC 947.05 Hobbs Brook Real Estate, LLC 238.4 Briar Realty Trust 143.226 Jonas Reality 105.8 Massachusetts Department

Rocheleau further notes, "*Subagencies including but not limited to the: Department of Environmental Protection, Department of Public Utilities, Department of Fish and Game, Department of Energy Resources, Department of Conservation and Recreation, Department of Agricultural Resources, Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act Office, and Massachusetts Environmental Police."

Rocheleau further notes, "*Subagencies including but not limited to the: Department of Environmental Protection, Department of Public Utilities, Department of Fish and Game, Department of Energy Resources, Department of Conservation and Recreation, Department of Agricultural Resources, Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act Office, and Massachusetts Environmental Police." Previous appeal This request was the subject of a previous appeal.

Department of Conservation and Recreation, 24 MCSR 573, 575 (Nov. 8, 2011). Thus, the DOR properly denied Mr. Crawfords reclassification request because he is not a supervisor. Insofar as the other level distinguishing duties are concerned, they are the same under the 1987 and 2001 specifications. An employee seeking reclassification must demonstrate that he performs the majority of the level distinguishing duties more than 50% of the time.

Department of Conservation & Recreation, 31 MCSR 337 (2018) (DCRs definition of major park and other terms); Trubiano v. Department of Conservation & Recreation, 31 MCSR 298 (2018) (definition of major recreational area and heritage park).

Department of Conservation and Recreation, 21 MCSR 23 (2008); Pollock and Medeiros v. Department of Mental Retardation, 22 MCSR 276 (2009); Pease v. Department of Revenue, 22 MCSR 284 (2009) & 22 MCSR 754 (2009); Poe v. Department of Revenue, 22 MCSR 287 (2009); Garfunkel v. Department of Revenue, 22 MCSR 291 (2009); Foster v. Department of Transitional Assistance, 23 MCSR 528; Heath v. Department of Transitional Assistance, 23 MCSR 548.

Department of Conservation & Recreation, 31 MCSR 337 (2018) (DCRs definition of major park and other terms); Trubiano v. Department of Conservation & Recreation, 31 MCSR 298 (2018) (definition of major recreational area and heritage park).

Department of Conservation & Recreation, 31 MCSR 337 (2018) (DCRs definition of major park and other terms); Trubiano v. Department of Conservation & Recreation, 31 MCSR 298 (2018) (definition of major recreational area and heritage park). ANALYSIS MEP has shown by a preponderance of evidence that it was reasonably justified to bypass Mr.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON THE PLAINTIFES MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (PAPER #6) INTRODUCTION The plaintiff, James Straub (Straub), works for the Lakes and Ponds Program,a division of the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR). He filed this action, pursuant to G. L. c. 30A, 14 and G.

Dreslinski requested "All records related to theft of Department of Conservation and Recreation property from the facility located on Wilson St., Clinton on or about August 6, 2007 ... including a glove print on a vehicle identified by Trooper Emily Phaneuf." Having received no response, Mr. Dreslinski petitioned this office.