On November 10, 2018, Romeo filed an appeal with the Civil ServiceCommission to be placed at the top of the eligible list for sergeant, and to be allowed to take an upcoming promotional examination for lieutenant, notwithstanding the civil service law, which states in part, that only those in the next lower title (ie. sergeant) are eligible to sit for the promotional examination (ie. lieutenant).
Additionally, | have matters pending at the Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD) and the Civil ServiceCommission (CSC). All these matter s deal with continued retaliation since my reinstatement approximately 9 months ago. Additionally please see MUP-19-7277 that was most recently filed at the DLR. cc: Howard L. Greenspan, Esq. Counsel for Town
The Town of Winthrop/Winthrop Police Department and many elected and appointed town officials. in addition to many grievances under the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) between the Town of Winthrop and the Police Unions and their subsequent Arbitrations, my matters have been heard at The Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination, The Civil ServiceCommission, Labor Relations Commission, The Superior Court, The Appellate Court, The Massachusetts
The Town of Winthrop/Winthrop Police Department and many elected and appointed town officials. in addition to many grievances under the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) between the Town of Winthrop and the Police Unions and their subsequent Arbitrations, my matters have been heard at The Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination, The Civil ServiceCommission, Labor Relations Commission, The Superior Court, The Appellate Court, The Massachusetts
CIVIL SERVICECOMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 617) 727-2293 DANIEL G. MORIARTY, Appellant v. G1-05-442 BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent Appellants Attorney: Brian E. Simoneau, Esq. 161 Worcester Road, Suite 200 Framingham, MA 01701 Appointing Authoritys Attorney: Tara L. Chisholm, Esq. Office of the Legal Advisor Boston Police Department One Schroeder Plaza Boston, MA 02120 Commissioner: John J.
CIVIL SERVICECOMMISSION One Ashburton Place, Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 617.727.2293 JOHN OLEARY, Appellant, v. D1-12-256 SALEM FIRE DEPARTMENT, Respondent Appearance for Appellant: Joseph P. Dever, Esq. Riley & Dever PC 210 Broadway, Suite 101 Lynnfield, MA 01940 Appearance for Respondent: Daniel B. Kulak, Esq. 147 Russell Street Peabody, MA 01960 Commissioner: Christopher C.
If he/she elects to proceed under these terms and conditions, he/she thereby waives his/her rights to appeal to the Massachusetts Civil ServiceCommission and may not thereafter change his/her decision without the written consent of the CITY. C. The EMPLOYEES election shall be delivered to the CITY in writing within three ( 3 ) days after written notification by the CITY disciplinary action, suspension or discharge. D.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICECOMMISSION 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 200 Boston, MA 02111 (617) 979-1900 KEVIN SMITH, Appellant v. BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent Docket Number: D1-22R-138 Appearance for Appellant: Kenneth H. Anderson, Esq. Anderson, Goldman, Tobin & Pasciucco, LLP 50 Redfield Street, #201 Boston, MA 02122 Appearance for Respondent: James J. Megee, Esq.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICECOMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Boston, MA Room 503 02108 (617) 727-2293 TIMOTHY FLOOD, Appellant vy. Case No.: G1-10-317 TOWN OF WAYLAND, Respondent PROCEDURAL ORDER On November 16, 2010, the Appellant filed an appeal with the Commission. A pre-hearing conference was held on December 13, 2010 and was attended by the Appellant, counsel for the Town and counsel! for HRD.
s termination to the Civil ServiceCommission. Settlements In early February 2011, the City reached agreements with five superior officers, including a deputy chief, a captain, and three lieutenants who were involved in the re-training controversy. The settlement agreements provided that those five superior officers would serve twelve-day suspensions, as well as waive their eligibility to receive certain monies.
The Union subsequently appealed A.F.s termination to the Civil ServiceCommission. The City negotiated settlements with five superior officers who were involved in the retraining controversy. None of them were terminated, but they all accepted twelve-day suspensions and waived their rights to receive certain monies. A captain also accepted a permanent demotion, a suspension of 1080 hours, payment of restitution and other penalties.
CIVIL SERVICECOMMISSION JHE 15 206 and WALTER DALEY _ ,,, on of Attorney General MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON Administrative 1 aw Dis sion CROSS-MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS This dispute arises from the Town of Wilmingtons (the Town) decision to bypass defendant Walter Daley (Mr. Daley) for a promotion to Lieutenant of its Fire Department from a certified Civil Service list.
CIVIL SERVICECOMMISSION & another1 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS The plaintiff Steven J. Adams (plaintiff or Adams) brings this action pro se pursuant to G. L. c. 31, 44 and G. L. c. 30A, 14, seeking judicial review of the decision of the defendant the Civil Service Commission (Commission) to affirm his termination by his former employer, the defendant the Department of the Correction (DOC).
CIVIL SERVICECOMMISSION & another MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Plaintiffs, the Town of Bourne (Town) and the Bourne Fire Department (BFD), filed this action seeking judicial review of the decision of Civil Service Commission (Commission) vacating BFDs tennination of civil service employee, former firefighter Thomas Swartz (Swartz).