The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records September 6, 2023 SPR23/2013 Sean Driscoll Communications Director Woods Hole, Marthas Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority 228 Palmer Avenue Falmouth, MA 02540 Dear Mr.
The Nantucket Steamship Authority 228 Palmer Avenue Falmouth, MA 02540 Dear Attorney Kenneally: I have received the petition of Nathaniel Trumbull appealing the nonresponse of The Nantucket Steamship Authority (Authority) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, on April 20, 2020, Mr.
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records October 25, 2023 SPR23/2495 Michael Simoneau Lieutenant/Records Access Officer Falmouth Police Department 750 Main Street Falmouth, MA 02540 Dear Lieutenant Simoneau: I have received the petition of Attorney Bradley M.
Town ofFalmouth, 39 MLC 347, 351 (2013) See attached for plan design changes, By these and other acts, the party complained of has interfered with, restrained, and/or coerced rights guaranteed by the Law. OLR FORM-005 (page 1) Revised 08/13 14. Cc (a) Is there a collective bargaining agreement that may apply to the conduct that is No Yes alleged to have violated the Law? of each.
Town ofFalmouth, 39 MLC 348, 350 (2013) (Hearing Officers Summary Decision)2 (the first step in the new statutory process was for each Respondent to accept Section 21, and until that occurred, each Respondent retained its Chapter 150E bargaining obligations). 2 Copy of Hearing Officers Summary Decision attached hereto as Exhibit 3. 4 19.
Town ofFalmouth, 39 MLC 347, 351 (2013) See attached for plan design changes. Law, By these and other acts, the party complained of has interfered with, restralned, and/or coerced rights guaranteed by the | DLR FORM-005 (page 1) Revised 08/13 14. Cl (a) Is there a collective bargaining agreement that may apply to the conduct that is Yes alleged to have violated the Law?
Town ofFalmouth, 39 MLC 348, 350 (2013) (Hearing Officers Summary Decision)2 (the first step in the new statutory process was for each Respondent to accept Section 21, and until that occurred, each Respondent retained its Chapter 150E bargaining obligations). 2 Copy of Hearing Officers Summary Decision attached hereto as Exhibit 3. 4 19.
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records June 27, 2023 SPR23/1293 Lieutenant Michael Simoneau Falmouth Police Department 750 Main Street Falmouth, MA 02540 Dear Lieutenant Simoneau: I have received the petition of Attorney James T. Morse, of the Law Offices of James T.
Town ofFalmouth v. Civil Serv. Commn, 447 Mass. 814, 823 (2006). Here, the Commission does not act without regard to the previous decision of the town, but rather decides whether there was reasonable justification for the action taken by the appointing authority in the circumstances found by the commission to have existed when the appointing authority made its decision. Id. (citing Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass. App. Ct. 331, 334 (1983)).
Town ofFalmouth, 20 MLC 1555, 1560, MUP-8114 (May 16, 1994); affd sub nom., Town of Falmouth v. Labor Relations Commission, 42 Mass. App. Ct. 1113 (1997). To determine whether the parties reached an agreement, the Commonwealth Employment Relations Board (CERB) considers whether there has been a meeting of the minds on the actual terms of the agreement.
Town ofFalmouth v. Civil Service Commn, 447 Mass. 814, 823 (2006) and cases cited. The role of the Commission is to determine "whether the appointing authority has sustained its burden of proving that there was reasonable justification for the action taken by the appointing authority." City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass.App.Ct. 300, 304, rev.den., 426 Mass. 1102 (1997). See also City of Leominster v.
Town ofFalmouth v. Civil Service Commn, 447 Mass. 814, 823 (2006) and 19 cases cited. The role of the Commission is to determine "whether the appointing authority has sustained its burden of proving that there was reasonable justification for the action taken by the appointing authority." City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass.App.Ct. 300, 304, rev.den., 426 Mass. 1102 (1997). See also City of Leominster v.