Box 946 Norfolk, MA 02052 Commissioner: Cynthia A. Ittleman, Esq.1 DECISION The Appellant, Douglas Desmarais (hereinafter Mr. Desmarais or Appellant), pursuant to G.L. c. 31, 2(b), seeks review of the decision of the Massachusetts Department of Correction (hereinafter DOC or Appointing Authority) to bypass him for an original appointment to the position of Correction Officer I.
Box 946 Norfolk, MA 02056 Administrative Magistrate: Angela McConney Scheepers, Esq. SUMMARY OF TENTATIVE DECISION The Department of Correction had reasonable justification to bypass the Appellant for promotion to Correction Officer II. I therefore recommend that the Civil Service Commission dismiss the appeal.
Box 946 Norfolk, MA 02056 (508) 850-7776 Dated: Jyfote- A3, 2O/>- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Earl Wilson, do hereby certify that I served the foregoing Respondents Answer upon the Charging Party by causing a copy to be mailed to him, postage prepaid, this -23*A day of October, 2012. Fall. ly So pr Earl Wilson
Box 946, Industries Drive Norfolk, MA Commissioner: 02056 Daniel M. Henderson DECISION The Appellant, Maura A. Scott (hereinafter Scott or Appellant), appeals the October 31, 2008 decision of the Department of Correction (hereinafter DOC or Appointing Authority) to permanently reassign her to the DOC facility at MCI-Norfolk. The appeal was timely filed. The Civil Service Commission (hereinafter Commission) held a full hearing on March 9, 2009.
Box 946 Industries Drive Norfolk, MA 02056 Administrative Magistrate: Joan Freiman Fink, Esq. SUMMARY OF DECISION The Appointing Authority has demonstrated just cause to demote the Appellant from his position as Correction Officer II to the position of Correction Officer I with the Department of Correction (DOC).
Box 946 Industries Drive Norfolk, MA 02056 Commissioner: Cynthia Ittleman1 DECISION Pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 31, section 2(b), the Appellant, Anthony Ferrara (hereafter Ferrara or Appellant), is appealing the decision of the Massachusetts Department of Correction (hereinafter Department or DOC), as the Appointing Authority, to bypass him for original appointment to the position of Correction Officer.
Box 946, Industries Drive Norfolk, MA 02056 Administrative Magistrate: Sarah H. Luick, Esq. Summary of Tentative Decision The Department of Correction (DOC) had a reasonable justification to bypass the Petitioner for hire as a Correction Officer (CO) I. The Petitioner was terminated from a prior job as a laborer in a warehouse. He pushed a co-worker under circumstances that were found to violate company policy. The coworker had provoked him.
Rice Department of Correction P.O, Box 946 Industries Drive Norfolk, MA 02056 Administrative Magistrate: Kenneth Bresler SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED DECISION Based on the Appellants incomplete application form and negative employment history, the Appointing Authority was reasonably justified in bypassing him for a correction officer position. I therefore recommend that the Civil Service Commission dismiss the appeal.