City of Quincy, 24 MCSR 416, 422 (2011); Lusignan v. City of Holyoke G & E Dept, 22 MCSR 137 (2009); Harrop v. Fall River School Comm., 22 MCSR 1 (2009) and cases cited. Analysis Brockton correctly asserts that the DPW is a single departmental unit for purposes of civil service law and rules. Brocktons municipal ordinances expressly define the DPW as a single departmental unit for purposes of Chapter 31.

City of Quincy, 24 MCSR 416, 422 (2011); Lusignan v. City of Holyoke G & E Dept, 22 MCSR 137 (2009); Harrop v. Fall River School Comm., 22 MCSR 1 (2009) and cases cited. Analysis Brockton correctly asserts that the DPW is a single departmental unit for purposes of civil service law and rules. Brocktons municipal ordinances expressly define the DPW as a single departmental unit for purposes of Chapter 31.

City of Quincy, 24 MCSR 416 (2011); Lusignan v. Holyoke G&E Dept., 20 MCSR 401, further considered, 21 MCSR 287, after hearing, 22 MCSR 137 (2009); Brienzo v. Town of Acushnet, 20 MCSR 530 (2007).

, MA 02169 Framingham, MA 01701 Quincy, MA 02169 Framingham, MA 01701 Quincy, MA 02169 Framingham, MA 01701 Wayland, MA 01778 Englewood, CO 80113 Ashland, MA 01721 Ashland, MA 01721 Natick, MA 01760 Framingham, MA 01702 Framingham MA, 01701 Mildred Cortez Palma Brenda Lee Bradford Yi Huang Lei Yi Huang Lei Yi Hi Lei Marcelo Manoel Madrona Marcelo Madrona Framingham, MA 01701 FRAMINGHAM, MA 01701 Framingham, MA 01702 Framingham, MA 01702 Framingham

City of Quincy, 17 MLC Regents of Higher Education, 10 MLSC 1196 (1983). an that agreement, the Union must show the To establish that the College repudiated College the agreement. See, Boston School Committee, 22 MLC MLC 1603, 1608 (1991). 1603 (1991), Mass.

See City of Boston, 28 MLC 194, 195, MUP-2185 (January 2, 2002); City of Quincy, Quincy City Hospital, 15 MLC 1239, 1241, MUP-6490 (November 9, 1988); City of Boston, 6 MLC 1117, MUP-2863 (June 4, 1979). Here, the Union has provided sufficient evidence to support a claim that the transfer of Killarneys former duties will result in bargaining unit members no longer performing any of the duties in question.

City of Quincy, 24 MCSR 416 (2011); Lusignan v. Holyoke G&E Dept., 20 MCSR 401, further considered, 21 MCSR 287, after hearing, 22 MCSR 137 (2009) Ms. Reis was the fifth most senior candidate who applied for the Carney School Assistant Cooks position and the evidence clearly established that there were three more senior candidates within the 2n+1 formula who were qualified for the position, of which Mr.

Ct. 9 (1991); Boston Housing Authority., 11 MLC 1195 n.11 (1984); and City of Quincy, 15 MLC 1340, 1368 (1989). 1189, Accordingly, these claims should be dismissed outright, as Ms. Aung can plead no set of facts as an individual to establish that the Respondent violated these provisions of the Law.

(Practice Areas\LABOR\12915\12050\A4222919.DOC} 3 City of Quincy, 17 MLC 1603 (1991); Massachusetts Board of Regents of Higher Education, 10 MLC 1196 (1983). Ifthe parties have different, good faith beliefs as to the meaning of a provision, no repudiation has occurred. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 18 MLC (1991); Boston Water & Sewer Commission, 15 MLC 1161 1319 (1989). The facts in this case are plain.

{Practice Arcas\LABORN291 S\2050\A4222919.D0C) 3 City of Quincy, 17 MLC 1603 (1991); Massachusetts Board of Regents of Higher Education, 10 MLC 1196 (1983). Ifthe parties have different, good faith beliefs as to the meaning of a provision,no repudiation has occurred. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 18 MLC 1161 (1991); Boston Water & Sewer Commission, 15 MLC 1319 (1989). The facts in this case are plain.