Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987). Under the first clause of Exemption (c), the City indicates that the records "contain medical files andlor information relating to a specifically named individual, the disclosure of which may constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy."

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987). In its November 13th response, the City asserts, "[o]n the call that is the subject of the pertinent 911 recording, the caller relayed information from an injured third-party to an Sean Levy Page 3 December 9, 2019 SPR19/2145 emergency dispatcher. In relaying this information to the emergency dispatcher, the caller indicated that the third-party had been injured in a motor vehicle accident.

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987). Second clause of (c) - privacy The City continues to assert that the second clause of Exemption (c) allows the City to withhold the 911 recording in its entirety. Analysis under the second clause of Exemption (c) is subjective in nature and requires a balancing of the publics right to know against the relevant privacy interests at stake. Torres v.

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987). Analysis under the second clause of Exemption (c) is subjective in nature and requires a balancing of the public's right to know against the relevant privacy interests at stake. Torres v. Attorney Gen., 391 Mass. 1, 9 (1984); Attorney Gen. v. Assistant Comrn'r of Real Property Dep't, 380 Mass. 623,625 (1980). Therefore, determinations must be made on a case by case basis.

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987). Analysis under the second clause of Exemption (c) is subjective in nature and requires a balancing of the public's right to know against the relevant privacy interests at stake. Torres v. Attorney Gen., 391 Mass. L 9 (1984); Attorney Gen. v. Assistant Comm'r of Real Propertv Dep't, 380 Mass. 623,625 (1980). Therefore, determinations must be made on a case by case basis.

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987). Second clause of Exemption (c) Analysis under the second clause of Exemption (c) is subjective in nature and requires a balancing of the public's right to know against the relevant privacy interests at stake. Torres v. Attorney Gen., 391 Mass. 1, 9 (1984); Attorney Gen. v. Assistant Comm'r of Real Property Dep't, 380 Mass. 623,625 (1980).

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987). To the extent that records contain medical information related to an identifiable individual, I find the Department may withhold such portions from the responsive records. Second clause of Exemption (c) privacy Analysis under the second clause of Exemption (c) is subjective in nature and requires a balancing of the publics right to know against the relevant privacy interests at stake. Torres v.

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987). The Department states in its July 21st response to Attorney Zuares, [t]he State 911 Department considers the requested 911 recordings regarding callers seeking medical assistance, as in the calls that are the subject of your records request, to be exempt...[t]hese calls relate to medical situations, reveal medical conditions, and are highly personal in nature.

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987). Second clause of Exemption (c) - privacy Analysis under the second clause of Exemption (c) is subjective in nature and requires a balancing of the public's right to know against the relevant privacy interests at stake. Torres v. Attorney Gen., 391 Mass. 1, 9 (1984); Attorney Gen. v. Assistant Comm'r of Real Property Dep't, 380 Mass. 623, 625 (1980).

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987). Chief Jody D. Kasper Page 3 December 21, 2017 SPRl 7/1692 The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts found that a records custodian may withhold from disclosure as personnel information records containing information that is "useful in making employment decisions regarding an employee." Wakefield Teachers Ass'n v. School Comm., 431 Mass. 792, 798 (2000).

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987). Second clause of Exemption (c) - privacy Analysis under the second clause of Exemption (c) is subjective in nature and requires a balancing of the public's right to know against the relevant privacy interests at stake. Torres v. Attorney Gen., 391 Mass. 1, 9 (1984); Attorney Gen. v. Assistant Comm'r of Real Property Dep't, 380 Mass. 623, 625 (1980).

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987). Claiming that the requested records are medical records and exempt from disclosure, the Department indicates that "[r]ecords that yield detailed, intimate information about the subject's medical condition are medical records." Globe Newspaper Co., 404 Mass. at 134-36.