City of Methuen, 34 MCSR 431 (2021); Connor v. Andover Police Dept., 30 MCSR 439 (2017); Dale v. Town of Wilmington, 28 MCSR 466 (2015), affd sub nom. Town of Wilmington v. Civil Service Commn, Suffolk Sup. Ct. C.A. 2015CV2963 (2016). CONCLUSION For the reasons stated above, Appellants appeal under Case No. G2-23-193 is dismissed nisi, to become effective on August 10, 2024.

Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 34 Stevensst Methuen MA 01844 ~ 42. Telephone Number 978-902-0567 47, FAX Number |48. E-mail E address inyfanatico@yahoo. com DECLARATION t have read the above charge of prohibited practice and swear under the pains and penalties of perjury that the Information contained in it is true and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. /49. Name Roberto Camacho 50.

May 22, 2020 Roberto Camacho 34 Stevens Street Methuen, MA 01844 Jasper Groner, Esq Segal, Roitman, LLP 33 Harrison Avenue, 7th Floor Boston, MA 02111 Re: MUPL-19-7476, National Conference of Firemen and Oilers, SEIU, Local 3, and Roberto Camacho Dear Mr. Camacho and Mr. Groner: Roberto Camacho (Camacho) appeals from a Department of Labor Relations (DLR) Investigators decision to dismiss the above-referenced charge of prohibited practice.

City of Methuen, 28 MCSR 345 (2015); Morris v. Braintree Police Dept, 27 MCSR 656 (2014); Absent documented evidence that the interview process was reasonably fair and objective and that the conclusions about candidates not overly subjective or arbitrary, the TFDs preference for one candidate over another could not justify this bypass on the basis of interview performance.

I-11-280 (2011) (Commission took action after investigation of appointments made in Oxford in which the direct involvement of the appointing authority compromised a selection process which favored certain relatives of the appointing authorities); In Re: City of Methuens Review and Selection of Reserve Police Officer Candidates in the Fall of 2008, CSC No.I-09-290 (2010) (same). 6 Request by John Mograss, et al. to Investigate the Failure To Administer

City of Methuen, 22 MCSR 504 (2009) (no prejudice shown due to procedural deficiencies); Waiyaki v. Department of Mental Retardation, 21 MCSR 196 (2008) (same); Rizzo v. Lexington, 21 MCSR 70 (2008) (same); Gariepy v. Department of Correction, 19 MCSR 211 (2006) (same). The evidence presented by Firefighter Carter does not constitute a showing of prejudice.

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records Brittany Getchell Records Access Officer Methuen Police Department 90 Hampshire Street Methuen, MA 01844 February 20, 2024 SPR24/0385 Dear Ms. Getchell: I have received the petition of Kent DeMott appealing the response of the Methuen Police Department (Department) to a request for public records.

City of Methuen, 28 MCSR 345 (2015); Morris v.

City of Methuen, 22 MCSR 391 (2009), findings and orders after investigation, CSC No. I-09-290 (2011) (rescinding hiring process and reconsideration of all candidates after Police Chief had participated in selection of her niece). After careful consideration, I have determined that an investigation is not warranted here.

appeals under Section 2(b) of Chapter 31, the Commission maintains broad discretion to review hiring decisions of Appointing Authorities under Section 2(a) of Chapter 31, While the Commission exercises this discretion only sparingly, it has not been afraid to do so when there is some evidence that personal or political bias has infected the hiring process and prevented individuals from receiving fair consideration for appointment or promotion, See City

Manzi Bonanno & Bowers 280 Merrimack Street, Suite B Methuen, MA O1844 Dear Attorney Bowers: I have received the petition of Attorney Matthew Andrade appealing the nomesponse of the Lawrence Housing Authority (Authority) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, lOA; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Attorney Andrade requested records regarding a certain Authority property.