No reasons that are known or reasonably discoverable by the appointing authority, and which have not been disclosed to the Personnel Administrator, shall later be admissible as reasons for selection or bypass in any proceeding before the Personnel Administrator or the Civil Service Commission.
Curran has appealed her discharge to the Civil ServiceCommission which has scheduled hearings for June 21 and 23, 2017." You assert that "Ms. Curran's on-going requests to MHA under the Public Records Law, appear to be an effort on her part to do an end run on the orderly and more limited discovery that is available to her in the context of her Civil Service Appeal."
CIVIL SERVICECOMMISSION & dnother.2 i City of Salem. 16-P-383 lr JEN 27 COR. Ci Simms Sendo SERViCe AMS Fes 26 HASS acim COMMISSION APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS 2017 Mass. App. January Unpub. 25, 2017, LEXIS 88 Entered NOTICE: SUMMARY DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE APPEALS COURT PURSUANT TO ITS RULE 1:28, AS AMENDED BY 73 MASS. APP.
Page | LexisNexis Vivin s 1 of 4 DOCUMENTS NUIAS DAVEIGA vs, CIVIL SERVICECOMMISSION 1 & another,' Boston Police Department 16-P-723 APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS 2017 Mass. App, Unpub, LEXIS 359 April 6, 2017, Entered NOTICE: SUMMARY DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE APPEALS COURT PURSUANT TO ITS RULE 1:28, AS AMENDED BY 73 MASS. APP.
He appeals from a judgment of a Superior Court judge affirming the decision of the Civil ServiceCommission (commission) that his discharge was proper. We conclude that the decision of the commission was supported by substantial evidence and was not arbitrary and capricious, and therefore, we affirm. Background. The disciplinary action against Rizzo resulted from an incident that took place on August 27, 2006.
CIVIL SERVICECOMMISSION & another. [FN1] *+09-P-2221+ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28 Matthew Edson appeals from an order of the Superior Court which granted the motion of the town of Reading (town) for judgment on the pleadings. The judge determined that the decision of the Civil Service Commission (commission) was not supported by substantial evidence, and was therefore arbitrary and capricious. We affirm.
MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICECOMMISSION, et al, Defendants MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND THE CROSS-MOTION OF THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSTON AND OF THE TOWN OF EASTON FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS PURSUANT TO MASS. R. CIV.
[FN2] 12-P-1355 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28 This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court dismissing as moot the Boston police department's (BPD) complaint challenging a decision of the Civil ServiceCommission (commission). We affirm. Background. The following facts are drawn from the findings of the commission and other documents of record.