MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, et al, Defendants MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND THE CROSS-MOTION OF THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSTON AND OF THE TOWN OF EASTON FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS PURSUANT TO MASS. R. CIV.

[FN2] 12-P-1355 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28 This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court dismissing as moot the Boston police department's (BPD) complaint challenging a decision of the Civil Service Commission (commission). We affirm. Background. The following facts are drawn from the findings of the commission and other documents of record.

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION & another.

He appeals from a judgment of a Superior Court judge affirming the decision of the Civil Service Commission (commission) that his discharge was proper. We conclude that the decision of the commission was supported by substantial evidence and was not arbitrary and capricious, and therefore, we affirm. Background. The disciplinary action against Rizzo resulted from an incident that took place on August 27, 2006.

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION & dnother.2 i City of Salem. 16-P-383 lr JEN 27 COR. Ci Simms Sendo SERViCe AMS Fes 26 HASS acim COMMISSION APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS 2017 Mass. App. January Unpub. 25, 2017, LEXIS 88 Entered NOTICE: SUMMARY DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE APPEALS COURT PURSUANT TO ITS RULE 1:28, AS AMENDED BY 73 MASS. APP.

Page | LexisNexis Vivin s 1 of 4 DOCUMENTS NUIAS DAVEIGA vs, CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1 & another,' Boston Police Department 16-P-723 APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS 2017 Mass. App, Unpub, LEXIS 359 April 6, 2017, Entered NOTICE: SUMMARY DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE APPEALS COURT PURSUANT TO ITS RULE 1:28, AS AMENDED BY 73 MASS. APP.

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, et al., Defendants.

Civil Service Commission and City of Methuen, Suffolk Superior Court Civil Action No. 2484CV03028; Commonwealth vs. Solomon, Joseph, Essex Superior Court Criminal Action No. 2377CR00451; Commonwealth vs. Fountain, Sean J, Essex Superior Court Criminal Action No. 2377CR00449). The above cases are still ongoing and the Nina I. Schulze, Esq.

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Michael Mazzola, Appellant v. G1-06-216 City of Worcester, Respondent Appellants Attorney: Pro Se Michael Mazzola 9 Mink Circle Worcester, MA 01604 Respondents Attorney: Lisa M. Carmody, Atty. City of Worcester 455 Main Street, Room 109 Worcester, MA 01608 Commissioner: Daniel M. Henderson 1 DECISION Pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 31, s. 2(b), the Appellant, Michael A.

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 DINO DEMAURO, Appellant Case No. D-10-68 v. WORCESTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Appointing Authority Appellants Representative: Salvatore Romano Massachusetts Laborers Dist. Council 7 Laborers Way Hopkinton, MA 01748 Respondents Attorney: Sean P. Sweeney, Esq. Law Offices of Sean P.