CIVIL SERVICECOMMISSION & another.1 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 23.0 The plaintiff appeals from a Superior Court judgment affirming the decision of the Civil Service Commission (commission) which, in turn, affirmed the town of Charlton's (town or Charlton) termination of the plaintiff's employment in the Charlton Police Department (CPD).
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICECOMMISSION SUFFOLK, SS. One Ashburton Place - Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 MATTHEW J. GREALISH, Appellant v. CASE NO: G1-08-25 REGISTRY OF MOTOR VEHICLES, Respondent Appellant: Matthew J. Grealish, Pro Se 545 Commercial Street Braintree, MA 02184 Appointing Authority Attorney : Robert M. Horack, Esq.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICECOMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Boston, MA Room 503 02108 (617) 727-2293 SEAN LAYTON, Appellant Vv. G1-10-293 CITY OF SOMERVILLE, Respondent RYAN LAYTON, Appellant v. G1-10-292 CITY OF SOMERVILLE, Respondent PROCEDURAL ORDER The Appellants (who are brothers) both filed individual appeals with the Civil Service Commission that are related to the same general issue.
CITY OF FITCHBURG & another. 1 1 Civil ServiceCommission. 15-P-198 APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS 2016 Mass. App. Unpub. LEXIS 98 February 2, 2016, Entered NOTICE: SUMMARY DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE APPEALS COURT PURSUANT TO ITS RULE 1:28, AS AMENDED BY 73 MASS. APP. CT. 1001 (2009), ARE PRIMARILY DIRECTED TO THE PARTIES AND, THEREFORE, MAY NOT FULLY ADDRESS THE FACTS OF THE CASE OR THE PANEL'S DECISIONAL RATIONALE.
L. c. 30A, of a decision of the Civil ServiceCommission (commission) that affirmed the Brookline School Department's (Brookline) termination of his employment. The parties filed cross motions for judgment on the pleadings. A judge of the Superior Court entered an order allowing the commission's motion, and judgment entered affirming the commission's decision. This appeal ensued. We affirm. Background.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICECOMMISSION 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 200 Boston, MA 02114 (617) 979-1900 BRENDA JAMES, Appellant D1-15-64 v. BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISION This appeal has followed one of the lengthier and more circuitous paths in the Commissions history.
No reasons that are known or reasonably discoverable by the appointing authority, and which have not been disclosed to the Personnel Administrator, shall later be admissible as reasons for selection or bypass in any proceeding before the Personnel Administrator or the Civil Service Commission.
CIVIL SERVICECOMMISSION & another. [FN1] *+09-P-2221+ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28 Matthew Edson appeals from an order of the Superior Court which granted the motion of the town of Reading (town) for judgment on the pleadings. The judge determined that the decision of the Civil Service Commission (commission) was not supported by substantial evidence, and was therefore arbitrary and capricious. We affirm.
Curran has appealed her discharge to the Civil ServiceCommission which has scheduled hearings for June 21 and 23, 2017." You assert that "Ms. Curran's on-going requests to MHA under the Public Records Law, appear to be an effort on her part to do an end run on the orderly and more limited discovery that is available to her in the context of her Civil Service Appeal."