Town ofFalmouth v. Civil Service Commn, 447 Mass. 814, 823 (2006) and cases cited. The role of the Commission is to determine "whether the appointing authority has sustained its burden of proving that there was reasonable justification for the action taken by the appointing authority. City of Cambridge 300, 304, rev.den., 426 Mass. Mass.App.Ct. v, Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass.App.Ct. 1102 (1997). See also City of Leominster v.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR RELATIONS In the Matters of REKKKRERKEKKEKRKKREEEKREKEKEREEEKEKKEKKEKKEA KKK KKK KK K TOWN OFFALMOUTH AND Case Nos:: MUP-12-1749 MUP-12-1750 MUP-12-1751 MUP-12-1752 MUP-12-1753 MUP-12-1754 MUP-12-1755 MUP-12-1756 MUP-12-1758 TOWN OF PROVINCETOWN AND Case Nos:.: PROVINCETOWN SCHOOL COMMITTEE, MUP-12-1705 MUP-12-1706 MUP-12-1707 MUP-12-1734 MUP-12-1735 MUP-12-1736 FALMOUTH SCHOOL COMMITTEE, and FALMOUTH
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR RELATIONS BEFORE THE COMMONWEALTH EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD In the Matters of RRERERERREERREHEERREREREERERA ARK KKKKKAKKKaEKKKRKKKKaKE TOWN OFFALMOUTH AND FALMOUTH SCHOOL COMMITTEE, Case Nos.: MUP-12-1749 MUP-12-1750 MUP-12-1751 MUP-12-1752 MUP-12-1753 MUP-12-1754 MUP-12-1755 MUP-12-1756 MUP-12-1758 Case Nos.: MUP-12-1705 and FALMOUTH EDUCATORS ASSOCIATION AND AFSCME, COUNCIL 93 TOWN OF PROVINCETOWN
(CQ COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS COMMONWEALTH EMPLOYEE RELATIONS BOARD TOWN OFFALMOUTH AND FALMOUTH SCHOOL COMMITTEE, Respondents Case Nos.: MUP-12-1749 MUP-12-1752 MUP-12-1753 MUP-12-1754 MUP-12-1755 MUP-12-1756 MUP-12-1758 MUP-12-1750 MUP-12-1751 Case Nos.
Town ofFalmouth v. Civil Service Comm'n, 447 Mass. 814, 823 (2006). Clark v. Boston Housing Authority, 24 MCSR 193 (2011), Clark v. Boston Housing Authority, Suffolk Superior Court, C.A. No. SUCV2011-2554E, affd (Feb. 13, 2015).
Town ofFalmouth v. Civil Service Commission, 61 Mass. App. Ct. 796, 800 (2004). The issue for the commission is "not whether it would have acted as the appointing authority had acted, but whether, on the facts found by the commission, there was reasonable justification for the action taken by the appointing authority in the circumstances found by the commission to have existed when the appointing authority made its decision." Watertown v.
Doyle Falmouth Police Department 750 Main Street Falmouth, MA 02540 Dear Lieutenant Doyle: I have received the petition of Attorney Valeriano Diviacchi appealing the response of the Falmouth Police Department (Department) to his request for public records. G. L. c. 66 lO(b); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2). Specifically, Attorney Diviacchi requested copies of records related to his client.
Town ofFalmouth v. Civil Service Commn, (2006) and cases cited. The role of the Commission 22 447 Mass. 814, 823 is to determine "whether the appointing authority has sustained its burden of proving that there was reasonable justification for the action taken by the appointing authority." City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commn, City 43 Mass.App.Ct. of Leominster_v. Stratton, 300, 304, rev.den., 426 Mass. 58 Mass.App.Ct. 726, 1102 (1997).
Town ofFalmouth v. Civil Service Commn, 447 Mass. 814, 823 (2006) and cases cited. The Commissions role is to determine "whether the appointing authority has sustained its burden of proving that there was reasonable justification for the action taken by the appointing authority." City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass.App.Ct. 300, 304, rev.den., 426 Mass. 1102 (1997). See also Police Dept of Boston v.