B2-21-179 through 185 HUMAN RESOURCESDIVISION, Respondent Appearance for Appellants: Alan Shapiro, Esq. Sandulli Grace, P.C. 44 School Street, 11th Floor Boston, MA 02108 Appearance for Respondent: Melissa Thomson, Esq. Human Resources Division 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 600 Boston, MA 02114 Commissioner: Christopher C.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617)727-2293 Request for Investigation against the Human ResourcesDivision by Petitioners1: Craig Hardy Scott Hogan Tracking No.: I-17-020 Stephen Merrill Scott Taylor Richard Costanza John Russo Donald Meninger Rocco Andreotti Thomas Pietrantonio William Hurley RULING ON REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION By letter dated January 24, 2017, Craig Hardy and
E-21-092 HUMAN RESOURCESDIVISION, Respondent Appearance for Appellants: Pro Se Joseph Brangwynne David Feyler William King Appearance for Respondent: Melissa Thomson, Esq. Human Resources Division 100 Cambridge Street Suite 600 Boston, MA 02114 Commissioner: Christopher C.
L.c. 30A, 14 to appeal a decision of the Civil Service Commission affirming a decision of the Massachusetts Human ResourcesDivision (HRD) denying him two additional training and experience points on his police promotional Pleadings. exam. Presently before the court is DeFrancescos Motion for Judgment on the For the reasons set forth below, the decision of the Commission is affirmed, and the plaintiff's motion is DENTED. .
Following the exam, six out of the one hundred seventy-eight candidates who had taken it complained to the Human ResourcesDivision ("the HRD") because the videotaped oral section of the exam included questions on Rule 200, a Boston Police Department Rule regarding critical incident management.2 Previously, a Boston Police Department memorandum informed the candidates that the written knowledge component of the exam would not cover Rule 200.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
salois-eugene-v-human-resources-division-related-superior-court-decision-71114-0 Salois, Eugene v. Human Resources Division-Related Superior Court Decision 7/11/14 Bypass Appeal Commonwealth of Massachusetts County of Essex The Superior Court ee Civil Docket ESCV2012-01971C mera RE: Salois Ill v Civil Service Commission et al alt JUL 18 A 5b TO: Iraida J Alvarez, Esquire 1 Ashburton Place 20th Floor JUL ig Ban = 9.
AWAD, (7 9B i = WEA, Plaintiff a YS. eo _$f F O8-DNO CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION and pao za sh HUMAN RESOURCEDIVISION, Defendants } & OD = Memorandum of Decision and Order on Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings The plaintiff, Rami M. Awad, brought this action for judicial review under G. L. c. 30A 14, of the defendant Civil Service Commissions decision not to require the defendant Human ResourcesDivision (HRD) to place Mr.
E-10-346 CITY OF SALEM AND HUMAN RESOURCESDIVISION, Respondents Appellants Attorney: Pro Se Michael Kochansky City of Salems Attorney: Daniel B. Kulak, Esq. Attorney at Law 147 Russell Street Peabody, MA 01960 Human Resources Divisions Attorney: Martha OConnor, Esq. Human ResourcesDivision One Ashburton Place: Room 211 Boston, MA 02108 Commissioner: Christopher C.
E-10-335 CITY OF SALEM AND HUMAN RESOURCESDIVISION, Respondents Appellants Attorney: Pro Se Robert C. Monk City of Salems Attorney: Daniel B. Kulak, Esq. Attorney at Law 147 Russell Street Peabody, MA 01960 Human Resources Divisions Attorney: Martha OConnor, Esq. Human ResourcesDivision One Ashburton Place: Room 211 Boston, MA 02108 Commissioner: Christopher C. Bowman DECISION The Appellant, Robert C.
E-10-330 CITY OF SALEM AND HUMAN RESOURCESDIVISION, Respondents Appellants Attorney: Pro Se Wesley Regan City of Salems Attorney: Daniel B. Kulak, Esq. Attorney at Law 147 Russell Street Peabody, MA 01960 Human Resources Divisions Attorney: Martha OConnor, Esq. Human ResourcesDivision One Ashburton Place: Room 211 Boston, MA 02108 Commissioner: Christopher C.