COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION SUFFOLK, ss. One Ashburton Place Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 NATHAN W. GOLDRICK, Appellant CASE NO. G1-17-127 v. CITY OF NEW BEDFORD, Respondent Appearance for Appellant: Michael McGlone, Esq. 128 Union Street New Bedford, MA 02740 Appearance for Respondent: Elizabeth Treadup Pio, Esq.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, SS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place, Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 979-1900 MICHAEL HATCH, Appellant v. TOWN OF AVON, Respondent G1-17-211 Appearance for Appellant: Appellant, pro se Appearance for Respondent: Scott E. Bettencourt, Esq. Bettencourt Law Group, P.C. 333 Tremont Street Duxbury, MA 02332 Commissioner: Cynthia Ittleman DECISION Pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 31, 2(b), Mr.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place, Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 MICHAEL MARCHIONDA, Appellant v. G1-19-254 BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent Appearance for Appellant: Stephen Delamere, Esq. Law Offices of Stephen Delamere 839 Washington Street Stoughton, MA 02072 Appearance for Respondent: Anthony Rizzo, Esq.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 979-1900 CORY MATCHEM Appellant v. CITY OF BROCKTON, Respondent CASE NO. G1-19-234 Appearance for Appellant: Thomas E. Horgan, Esq. Hanley Law Offices, LLC 308 Victory Road, Floor 3 Quincy, MA 02171 Appearance for Respondent: Karen A. Fisher, Esq.

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 979-1900 DAVID ROLLINS, Appellant v. G1-19-095 MASSACHUSETTS PAROLE BOARD, Respondent Appearance for Appellant: David P. Cortese, Esq. Law Office of David P. Cortese, P.C. 426 Pakachoag Street Auburn, MA 01501 Appearance for Respondent: Courtney E. Doherty, Esq. Counsel Massachusetts Parole Board 12 Mercer Road Natick, MA 01760 Commissioner: Cynthia A. Ittleman, Esq.

MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION & others MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT The plaintiffs, Victor Paiva and Scott Finkle, are Lieutenants employed by the Department of Corrections (DOC). position of Captain at the DOC.

agreement exclude Civil Service matters from arbitration (Emphasis supplied) The citys position on whether the department should defer to arbitration is that since there is no question or doubt about the fact and law that since the inception of Chapter 31 the Civil Service law in Massachusetts, absent an alleged issue of union animus historically, bypass issues have universally been resolved through the jurisdiction and provisions of Chapter 31 and the Civil

Challenges to the application of the merit principles of Civil Service law and rules, absent a charge of anti union animus, are jurisdictionally subject to review by the Civil service Commission not the DLR. 5. In June of 2019, the City changed its promotional procedures by assessing the candidates' sick leave history, disciplinary record, content in personnel file and active service time within the Lieutenant 2 position.

In fact and law, the authorizing and enabling provisions of Chapter 31 our Civil Service Law jurisdictionally and expressly authorize and enable the Civil Service Commission to assess and rule on bypass matters.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 100 Cambridge Street; Suite 200 Boston, MA 02114 (617) 979-1900 DEVANTE INFANTINO, Appellant v. CITY OF FITCHBURG, Respondent Docket Number: D-24-020 Appearance for Appellant: DeVante Infantino, Pro se Appearance for Respondent: Eric T. McKenna, Esq. Valerio Dominello & Hillman, LLC One University Avenue, Suite 300B Westwood, MA 02090 Commissioner: Angela C.

yriisenin ce 4 Gio The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Civil Service Commission oS MICHAEL TOWNSLEY, Appellant CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Cease ome (617) 727-2293 y. TOWN OF GREENFIELD, Case No.: D-07-343 Respondent DECISION After careful review and consideration, the Civil Service Commission voted at an executive session on April 8, 2010 to acknowledge receipt of the report of the Administrative Law Magistrate dated January 26, 2010.

*be(\V e>S\2-2o(v^) SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-1806-E FERRUCCIO ROMEO y.y;yyy VS. . ' - CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION and TOWN OF WINTHROP : ' ." ' ' . MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANTS JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS G. L. c 30A V,; AFFEAL FOR. FAILURE TO'PROSECUTE y.-. VAG; Av : ^ . On June 6, 2019, the pro se plaintiff, Ferruccio Romeo (plaintiff), who is an attorney, filed a complaint for judicial review pursuant to G.