Tags
Agencies
Show All
Displaying items 211-220 of 372 in total
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Teixiera, Angelo v. Department of Correction 7/24/14
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
Box 946 Norfolk, MA 02056 Commissioner: Christopher C. Bowman DECISION On January 8, 2014, the Appellant, Angelo Teixeira (Mr. Teixeira), pursuant to G.L. c. 31, 2(b), filed this appeal with the Civil Service Commission (Commission), contesting the decision of the Massachusetts Department of Correction (DOC) to bypass him for original appointment as a permanent, full-time Correction Officer I (CO I).
Department of Labor Relations Cases
Weston Education Association / Weston School Committee
1 document · · Department of Labor Relations ·
Norfolk, MA 02056 Dear Heather, This letter is in response to the Level 2 grievance filed on your behalf. The grievance claims that the three (3) day unpaid disciplinary suspension issued to you by Dr.
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
Box 946 Norfolk, MA 02056 Commissioner: Daniel M. Henderson DECISION Pursuant to provisions of M.G.L.c. 31, 43, the Appellant, Dennis Hansbury (hereinafter the Appellant or Hansbury) appealed the decision of the Massachusetts Department of Correction (hereinafterDOC), claiming the DOC lacked just cause to suspended the Appellant for thirty (30) days for being untruthful during a DOC investigation.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Cuff, Cherise v. Department of Correction 12/16/10
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
Box 946 Industries Drive Norfolk, MA 02056 Hearing Officer: Angela C. McConney, Esq.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
English, Kristen v. Department of Correction 10/1/09
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
Box 946 Norfolk, MA 02056 Daniel M. Henderson!
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Horan, William v. Department of Correction 8/20/09
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
Box 946 Norfolk, MA 02506 (508) 850-7890 Commissioner: Daniel M. Henderson 1 DECISION William Horan (hereinafter the Appellant or Horan) filed an appeal pursuant to G.L. c. 31 43, claiming that the Department of Correction (hereinafter DOC) did not have just cause to impose a three day suspension without pay. A hearing was held before the Civil Service Commission (hereinafter Commission) on April 23, 2008.
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
Box 946 Norfolk, MA 02056 Administrative Magistrate: James P. Rooney, Esq. Summary of Decision The Department of Correction had reasonable justification to bypass an applicant for the position of Correction Officer I. He failed to show an understanding of the role of a correction officer and had poor communications skills. RECOMMENDED DECISION Christopher C.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Louis, Stevenson v. Department of Correction 1/9/14
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
Box 946 Industries Drive Norfolk, MA 02056 Administrative Magistrate: James P. Rooney, Esq. Summary of Decision Department of Corrections decision to bypass correction officer applicant affirmed based on a Department policy of bypassing candidates who have been arraigned on criminal charges in the time period relevant to the Department.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Marino, Katelyn v. Department of Correction 4/3/14
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
Box 946: Industries Drive Norfolk, MA 02056 Commissioner: Christopher C. Bowman DECISION Pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 31, 2(b), the Appellant, Katelyn Marino (Ms. Marino), filed an appeal with the Civil Service Commission (Commission) on December 27, 2013, regarding the decision of the Department of Correction, the Appointing Authority (DOC), to bypass her for appointment to the position of Correction Officer I (CO I).
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Shine, Deanna v. Department of Correction 10/29/15
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
Box 946 Industries Drive Norfolk, MA 02056 Administrative Magistrate: Kenneth Bresler SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED DECISION The Human Resources Divisions decision not to reclassify the appellant as a Program Coordinator or Research Analyst is affirmed because she does not supervise employees or perform the duties of those positions more than 50% of the time.
Displaying items 211-220 of 372 in total