See also, City of Peabody, 28 MLC 281, 284 (2002) (letter that counseled a police officer on his job duties and responsibilities but was not punitive did not _ constitute adverse action). Also, the mere action of providing an employee with due process rights, though possibly inconvenient or even undesirable, does not constitute an adverse employment action unless it materially disadvantages the employee in some way. See MacCormack v.

Murray Supervisor of Records December 31, 2019 SPR19/2485 Captain Eric Zawacki Peabody Police Depaiiment 6 Allens Lane Peabody, MA O1960 Dear Captain Zawacki: I have received the petition of Adam Bradley appealing the response of the Peabody Police Department (Depaiiment) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, 1OA; also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1 ). Specifically Mr. Bradley reqtiested copies of records regarding a home shooting incident. Mr.

Macarelli Records Access Officer Peabody Public Schools 27 Lowell Street Peabody, MA 01960 Dear Ms. Macarelli: I have received the petition of Open Commonwealth (requestor) appealing the response of the Peabody Public Schools (School/District) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On April 6, 2024, the requestor sought the following for the period of January 1, 2018 through April 5, 2024: [1.]

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records August 16, 2024 SPR24/2256 Robert Faletra Police Sergeant Peabody Police Department 6 Allens Lane Peabody, MA 01960 Dear Sergeant Faletra: On August 9, 2024, this office received your petition on behalf of the Peabody Police Department (Department) seeking permission to charge for time spent segregating

Marcus Peabody Police Department 6 Allens Lane Peabody, MA 01960 Dear Captain Marcus: I have received the petition of Jeff Raymond, of the Bramanville Tribune, appealing the response of the Peabody Police Department (Department) to his request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On April 16, 2023, Mr. Raymond requested the following records: [1.]

Marcus Keeper of Records Town of Peabody Police Department 6 Allens Lane Peabody, MA 01960 Dear Lieutenant Marcus: I have received the petition of Charles Scott Nierman, Esq. appealing the response of Town of Peabody Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Attorney Nierman requested records pertaining to two identified Department officers, specifically: 1.

Murray Supervisor of Records Captain Douglas Marcus Administrative Commander Peabody Police Department 6 Allens Ln Peabody, MA 01960 May 27, 2022 SPR22/1155 Dear Captain Marcus: I have received the petition of Andrew Quemere appealing the response of the Peabody Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On May 1, 2022, Mr.

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records March 26, 2025 SPR25/0792 Captain Douglas Marcus Records Access Officer Peabody Police Department 6 Allens Lane Peabody, MA 01960 Dear Captain Marcus: On March 21, 2025, this office received your petition on behalf of the Peabody Police Department (Department) requesting permission to charge for time spent

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records June 12, 2025 SPR25/1596 Captain Douglas Marcus Records Access Officer Peabody Police Department 6 Allens Lane Peabody, MA 01960 Dear Captain Marcus: On June 6, 2025, this office received your petition on behalf of the Peabody Police Department (Department) requesting permission to charge for time spent

City of Peabody, 9 MLC 1447 (1982). Here, the Union has not established that the City changed an existing condition of employment in the job posting. The Union argued at the investigation that prior to the September 25, 2012 job posting, the City had not allowed a grace period of up to one year for mechanics to receive a hydraulic license.