On September 7, 2017, the above-named Employer repudiated the settlement agreement reached with the above-named Employee Organization by refusing to allow the refunding of vacation time pursuant to the terms of the parties settlement agreement. (See attached.) By these and other acts, the above-named Employer has interfered with, restrained, and coerced employees rights under the Law.
Hearing Officer Department of Labor Relations 19 Staniford Street, 1st Floor Boston, MA 02114 (617) 626-7133 susan.atwater@massmail.state.ma.us From: Leigh Panettiere [mailto:lpanettiere@sandulligrace.com] Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 1:03 PM To: Atwater, Susan (DLR); Boyle, Robert (Labor Relations) Subject: MUP-06-4724, City of Boston (compliance) - Settlement Hello, Ms. Atwater - s entc Dl der.
It is for these reasons that the Department can enter into a unilateral settlement agreement and a unilateral settlement agreement provides good cause to dismiss/withdraw the complaint. Ili. The unilateral settlement agreement in this case provides an effective remedy under the law.
It did not a separate hearing officer decision will not issue after the DLR approves the Unilateral Settlement Agreement. both the Director Rather, the DLRs unilateral settlement procedure provides that after the DLR Director approves it, the charge will be dismissed, and the complaint withdrawn based on the terms of the agreement. See httos:/Awww.mass.gov/service-details/unilateral-settlement (last accessed August 29, 2019).
It did not a separate hearing officer decision will not issue after the DLR Director approves the Unilateral Settlement Agreement. Rather, the DLRs unilateral settlement procedure provides that after the DLR Director approves it, the charge will be dismissed, See and the complaint withdrawn based on the terms of the agreement. 29, August httos:/Avww.mass.qov/service-details/unilateral-settlement (last accessed 2019).
The School Committee is directed Unilateral Settlement Agreement. to implement each of the terms of the If the School Committee fails to comply with any of the terms, the DLR will reissue the Complaint and all of the allegations will be deemed 11 admitted, 12 Agreement for hearing. leaving only the issue of non-compliance with the Unilateral Settlement SO ORDERED.
Yes No Note: The OLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(1). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name ; Chelmsford Federation of Teachers, AFT Local 3] 19. 20. Telephone Number Haidee Morris, AFTMA 617-423-3342 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 38 Chauncy St, Suite 402, Boston, MA 22. 18. Representative to contact 21.
On September 11, 1996, Appellant entered into a settlement agreement, (hereinafter, the 1996 Settlement Agreement), for the conduct referenced in paragraphs 3-7 above. (Exhibit 7, testimony of Michael Cronin). 11.
That charge was resolved by a settlement agreement between Kelley and the School Committee entered into on June 26, 2014 (2014 Settlement Agreement). In the 2014 Settlement Agreement, among other things, the Employer represented that it expected to post an Area Manager position on a permanent basis as early as the fall of 2016 and that its agents would interview Kelley in good faith for the next posted vacancy. Kelley filed Case No.
Kelley, would like to file charges against Facilities Management for failing to honor our settlement agreement, which specifies I am entitled to an interview the next time the Area Manager position was posted to be filled. I have previously filed against Boston Public Schools (BPS) when they last failed to honor the settlement agreement.
On June 26, 2014, Kelley and the School Committee entered into a settlement agreement (June 26, 2014 settlement agreement) pertaining to Case No. settlement agreement stated in pertinent part: 1. The BPS [Employer] MUP-14-3679. represents that it neither conducted The June 26, 2014 interviews nor filled the postings for the position of Area Manager that are referenced in the charge in this case (posting 343000 and posting 345257). 2.
The Parties Pre-2007 Settlement Agreements In 1987, the City, the Department and the Union signed a settlement agreement that stated, in part: In full and final settlement of the above-captioned agree as follows: matter the...
Herman requested any and all settlement agreements executed by the hospitals owned by the Department of Public Health for the period January 1, 2017 to the present. The Department responded on December 21, 2022 and January 10, 2023. Unsatisfied with the Departments responses, Mr. Herman petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR23/0075, was opened as a result.
On or around November 16, 2017, in connection with the three parties litigation of MUP-15-4572, AFSCME became aware of two settlement agreements between the BPL and the PSA related to MUP-16-5244, another case involving all three parties.2 The first settlement agreement, signed on October 20, 2016 (2016 Agreement), provides, in relevant part: Whereas the BPLPSA filed MUP-16-5244, which in relevant part challenged the alleged transfer of exclusive
Fait Accompli Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge | toa Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (0), O ; Employer(E); | 40. Name AFSCME Council 93 ; Al, Representative to contact Joseph DeLorey 43,44,45,46.
Feathers indicates "[t]he agency provided me with a list of settlement payments including a three-letter code for the agency that made the payment, the year of the payment, and the amount. That document does not satisfy my request."
Over several months, the parties attempted to negotiate a settlement agreement. On or about November 29, 2017, the Union requested additional changes to the proposed Settlement Agreement. The Town agreed to those changes.