See Town of West Springfield, 8 MLC 1041, 1047 (1981) (noting that a union vice presidents ticketing of patrol cars, abusive and threatening conduct and insubordinate refusals to act fell outside of the realm of protected activity.). In the present matter, Bernard acted in an insubordinate fashion when she informed Clerge that she did not want to be told what to do with regard to MAP maintaining MAP recertification.

See Town of West Springfield, 8 MLC 1041, 1047 (1981) (noting that a union vice presidents ticketing of patrol cars, abusive and threatening conduct and insubordinate refusals to act fell outside of the realm of protected activity.). In the present matter, Bernard acted in an insubordinate fashion when she informed Clerge that she did not want to be told what to do with regard to MAP maintaining MAP recertification.

Fax Number 26 Central Street, West Springfield, MA 01089 (413) 527-8566 7. 8a. No. of employees in Unit Unit involved (attached additional sheets if necessary) Included School Clerical/Secretarial Unit 29 8b. Are any of the employees included in the unit currently represented?

Fennell, Liquori & Powers 84 Park Street West Springfield, MA 01089 (413) 731-7655 wfennell@attysflp.com Respondents Attorney: Stanley L. Weinberg, Esq. 47 Memorial Drive Shrewsbury, MA 01545 (508) 842-1556 slwhudson@comcast.net Commissioner: Christopher C. Bowman DECISION Pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 31, 2(b), the Appellant, David G.

Fennell, Esq. 84 Park Street, 2nd Floor West Springfield, MA 01089 Appearance for Respondent: Stanley L. Weinberg, Esq. 11 John Robinson Drive Hudson, MA 01749 Commissioner: Christopher C. Bowman DECISION On August 31, 2018, the Appellant, David Irwin (Sgt.

Randolph 84 Park Avenue West Springfield, MA 01089 Thomas John Rooke, Esq. Attorney for James Shewchuck 73 Chestnut Street Springfield, MA 01103 Respondents Attorney William G. Cullinan, Esq. City of Springfield Law Dept. 36 Court Street, Room 210 Springfield, MA 01103 Commissioner: John J. Guerin, Jr. 1 DECISION Pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 31, 2(b), the Appellants James Shewchuk and Richard J.

See Town of West Springfield and Janet constructive (treating a prima face case under affirms the For the reasons set forth below, the CERB dismissal of these counts. In determining whether the Union established the third prong of the prima facie case, the Hearing what actions of the Law.

Town of West Springfield, 21 MLC 1216, 1219-20 (1994). A constructive discharge occurs when the burden imposed upon the employee causes, and is intended to cause, a change in working conditions so difficult or unpleasant as to force him or her to resign. Id. at 121920 (citing Crystal Princeton Refining Co., 222 NLRB 1068, 1069 (1976)).

Ct. 50 (1980); the insubstantiality of the reasons advanced by the employer for the action, Boston City Hospital, 11 MLC at 1702; Town of West Springfield, 8 MLC 1041, 1047-48 (1981); departure from established procedures, Town of Natick, 7 MLC 1048 (1988), affd sub nom, Board of Selectmen of Natick v. Labor Relations Comm n, 16 Mass. App.

Dunlap, 27 MLC 113, 114 n.6, SUPL-2696 (February 9, 2001) (declining to find that drug test violated employees rights under the United States Constitution); Town of West Springfield, 21 MLC 1216, 1222-1223 (August 19, 1994) (citing Plymouth Police Brotherhood v.

Dunlap, 27 MLC 113, 114 n.6, SUPL-2696 (February 9, 2001) (declining to find that drug test violated employees rights under the United States Constitution); Town of West Springfield, 21 MLC 1216, 1222-1223 (August 19, 1994) (citing Plymouth Police Brotherhood v.

Dunlap, 27 MLC 113, 114 n.6, SUPL-2696 (February 9, 2001) (declining to find that drug test violated employees rights under the United States Constitution); Town of West Springfield, 21 MLC 1216, 1222-1223 (August 19, 1994) (citing Plymouth Police Brotherhood v.