G.L.c.121B to serve low- and moderate-income, disabled and elderly individuals and families residing in the City of Medford, MA (Medford) by providing them with safe and affordable rental housing.

Fourth, an arbitration award from the City of Medford, MA and a Department of Labor Relations Department decision, involving nearly identical circumstances, supports the grievance. There, Arbitrator Greenbaum found that the Citys change in the ability of officers to work in a different rank violated the CBAs past practice and did not implicate managerial rights.

Ct. 537 (July 10, 2018), represents no change in the non-delegable doctrine; and 4) an arbitration award involving the City of Medford and a DLR decision in City of Peabody support the Unions grievance.

.: 617-394-2290 Account Number 01-121-2-5420 Unit Price OFFICE SUPPLIES TOTAL OF PURCHASE 7 ORDER Extended Price $115.88 $115.88 $115.88 /8 Middlese-: Ave Medford, MA 781 9396-0735 Club:1 Ger Mor.

E-22-106 CITY OF MEDFORD, Respondent Appearance for Appellants: Leah Marie Barrault, Esq. The Labor Collaborative 3 Boulevard Street Milton, MA 02186 Appearance for Respondent: Brian M. Maser, Esq. KP Law 101 Arch Street, 12th Floor Boston, MA 02110 Commissioner: Christopher C.

.: D-05-178 vz CITY OF MEDFORD, Respondent DECISION Upon remand to the Civil Service Commission (hereinafter Commission) following the June 19, 2009, decision of the Suffolk Superior Court (Kenton- Walker, J.), the Commission voted on a revised Decision at executive session on November 12, 2009.

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION Petitioners Request and Commissions Initial Response On February 14, 2024, the Petitioners, Neil Rosie, Peter Ziobro, Dan Marino and the Medford Firefighters Union Local 1032 (Petitioners), filed a petition with the Civil Service Commission (Commission), asking the Commission to investigate the legality of [the City of Medford]s refusal to implement promotions [in the Citys Fire Department] in accordance with

Ovalle, Esq. 1 Shipyard Way, Suite 1190 Medford, Ma 02155 Eva C. Ovalle, Esq.

She concluded: "By verbally harassing and acting in an assaulting manner towards [the victim], the Appellant violated the City of Medford's Sexual Harassment Policy. The fact that the Appellant's misconduct occurred while he was off duty did not preclude the Appointing Authority from imposing disciplinary action as he had violated an established policy of his employer. .. .

Re MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIEFS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS : Introduction The plaintiff, (se) Joseph Schiavone (Schiavone), brings this action guemeant toG.L.c. g a 30A, 14 to appeal a decision of the Civil Service Commission (Commission), upholdin error in the one-year suspension imposed by the City of Medford (City). Schiavone claims (Kenton-Walker, J.).

BAe CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION AND CITY OF MEDFORD PHER MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFES MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS This is an appeal, pursuant to G.L. c. 30A 14, by the plaintiff Joseph Schiavone (Schiavone), seeking review of a decision by the defendant, Civil Service Commission (the Commission), upholding Schiavones one year suspension without pay from his position as a Motor Equipment Operator 2 Laborer with the defendant