Town of Lexington v. Civil Service Commn, 27 Mass. L. Rptr. 106 (2010)(Curran, J.)(the Town enjoyed discretion to choose which candidates to promote...). Anthony vs. City of Springfield, 23 MCSR 201 (2010)(Appointing Authorities have discretion when choosing individuals from a certified list of eligible candidates on a civil service list.); Bariamis v.

Town of Lexington, 21 MCSR 634 (2008) (discharge upheld based partially on officers dishonesty regarding a use of force incident); and Desharnias v. City of Westfield, 23 MCSR 418 (2009) (discharge upheld based primarily on officers dishonesty about a relatively minor infraction that occurred on his shift). Wine v. City of Holyoke, 31 MCSR 19 (2018). See also Gonsalves v. Falmouth, 25 MCSR 231 (2012), affd sub nom. Gonsalves v.

Town of Lexington, 21 MCSR 634 (2008); (discharge upheld based partially on officers dishonesty regarding a use of force incident); Desharnias v.

Town of Lexington, 21 MCSR 634 (2008), the Commission upheld the discharge of a police officer for excessive force, lying, conduct unbecoming and failure to follow procedures. In Mozeleski v. City of Chicopee, 21 MCSR 676 (2008), the Commission upheld the discharge of a police officer who conducted a late-night traffic stop involving a sole female and his subsequent conduct in falsifying a report in an attempt to cover up his interaction.

Town of Lexington, 21 MCSR 589, 597 (2008) citing Sabourin v. Town of Natick, 18 MCSR 79 (2005) (A civil service test score is the primary tool in determining relative ability, knowledge and skills and in taking a personnel action grounded in basic merit principles.).

. ======================================================================================== AGREEMENT Pursuant to the provisions of the General Laws of Massachusetts, this agreement is made this first day of September 1, 2015, by the SCHOOL COMMITTEE OF THE TOWN OF LEXINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS, (hereinafter referred to as School Committee) and jointly and severally by the members of the LEXINGTON EDUCATION ASSOCIATIONs Unit A (hereinafter referred to as

Framingham, MA 01702 Framingham, MA 01701 Omaha, NE 68114 Omaha, NE 68114 Omaha, NE 68114 Omaha, NE 68114 Omaha, NE 68114 Omaha, NE 68114 Omaha, NE 68114 Omaha, NE 68114 Framingham, MA Framingham, MA 01702 Framingham, MA 01702 Framingham, MA 01702 Framingham MA, 01702 Framingham, MA 01702 Framingham, MA 01702 Framingham MA, 01702 Framingham, MA 01701 Framingham MA, 01701 Framingham, MA Framingham, MA 01701 Framingham, MA 01701 FRAMINGHAM MA 01701 Lexington

Oliveira Auricelio Antonio dos Santos Jason DiMarzio Laura M Deignan Framingham, MA 01701 Framingham, MA 01701 FRAMINGHAM MA 01701 Lexington, MA 02421 Framingham, MA 01701 Framingham, MA 01701 Holliston, MA 01746 Framingham MA, 01701 Framingham, MA 01701 Framingham MA, 01701 Framingham, MA 01701 Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 Framingham, MA 01701 Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 Holliston, MA 01746 Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 Mt.

Town of Lexington, 21 MCSR 589, 597 (2008) citing Sabourin v. Town of Natick, 18 MCSR 79 (2005) (A civil service test score is the primary tool in determining relative ability, knowledge and skills and in taking a personnel action grounded in basic merit principles.).

Town of Lexington, 21 MCSR 634 (2008); (discharge upheld based partially on officers dishonesty regarding a use of force incident); Desharnias v. City of Westfield, 23 MCSR 418 (2009) (discharge upheld based primarily on officers dishonesty about a relatively minor infraction that occurred on his shift). Kinnas v.