Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination, 65 Mass. App. Ct. 329, 333 (2005). The court also affords due weight to the experience, technical competence, and specialized knowledge of the agency, as well as to the discretionary authority conferred upon it. Buchanan v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board, 65 Mass. App. Ct. 244, 246 (2005), quoting Lisbon v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Bd., 41 Mass. App. Ct. 246, 257 (1996).

Duphily, currently a police sergeant and police chief, respectively, with the Town of Carver (Carver), filed petitions with the Civil Service Commission (Commission), seeking relief, pursuant to the Commissions equitable authority inherent in Chapter 534 of the Acts of 1976 as amended by Chapter 310 of the Acts of 1993, relative to a decision of the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD), MCAD Docket 00690/02404/02406 (the MCAD Proceeding

See OML 2018-91 (explaining that gender-based harassment complaints should be filed with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination); OML 2019-166 (explaining that [a]n allegation of unprofessional conduct or incivility towards a member of the Commission or the public does not constitute a violation of the Open Meeting Law).

Finally, DLR should note that Hiett is already in litigation with the City at the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD). His complaint before the MCAD is based on the exact same facts presented to DLR in this matter. Exhibit 11. Local 863s Charge filed with DLR also has the flavor of impermissible forum shopping by Hiett.

Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination, 20 Mass. App. Ct. 2 172 2. . 2. LL a a (1985) 46 | 3g ... 43 Carter v. Commissioner of Corrections, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 212 (1997)) 2... 2 ok... OB City of Salem v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination, 44 Mass. App. Ct. 627 (1998) Cn a a ee 26, 43 Costa v. Desert Palace 299 (9% F.3d Cir. 838 2002) ......202. eo Bt Cummings 265 F.3d v. 56 Standard (18% Cir.

The City's September 26th response In the City's September 26th response, it indicated that "[t]he City possesses records responsive to your request in the form of: a copy of complaint filed with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination; internal correspondence regarding the complaint; and an email from the complainant" to an identified individual.

Maloney wishes to pursue a discrimination complaint he may file with the Attorney General's Office Civil Rights Division at (617) 963-2917 or the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination at (617) 994-6000. o the meeting.

If, as the Appellant suggested at the conclusion of oral argument, that there may have been tinges of racial discrimination at play here, then the correct venue is the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination, where the Appellant has already filed a complaint.

Under certain circumstances, as appears to be the case with a large number of the Appellants, individuals may choose to file a complaint in other venues, such as the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD).

FACTS, ANSWER AND EXPLANATION The issues surrounding this charge are related to the Colleges response to a Probable Cause finding by the (MCAD) that an AFSCME Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination Employee that the College did not consider a supervisory employee for Title IX purposes was considered following a complaint that the AFSCME a supervisor for liability purposes employee, a Laboratory Technician II (now former employee) had sexually

The issues surrounding this charge are related to the Colleges response to a Probable Cause (MCAD) that an AFSCME finding by the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination Employee that the College did not consider a Supervisory employee for Title IX purposes was considered by the MCAD as a supervisor for liability purposes following a complaint that the AFSCME employee, a Laboratory Technician II (now former employee) had sexually harassed a