Civil Service Commission. 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 304 (1997). In order to show reasonable justification, the appointing authority must demonstrate that the employee has been guilty of substantial misconduct which adversely affects the public interest by impairing the efficiency of the public service. School Committee of Brockton v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 486, 488 (1997).

Bowman DECISION ON RESPONDENTS MOTION TO DISMISS Procedural Background Pursuant to G.L. c. 31, 43, the Appellant, Martin Novia, (hereafter Appellant or Novia) filed an appeal with the Civil Service Commission on March 27, 2006 indicating that he wanted to appeal the decision of the City of New Bedford (hereafter the City or Appointing Authority) to discharge him.

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 ERIC CONNOLLY, Appellant v. B2-19-189 HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION, Respondent Appearance for Appellant: Pro Se Eric Connolly Appearance for Respondent: Patrick Butler, Esq. Human Resources Division 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 600 Boston, MA 02114 Commissioner: Christopher C. Bowman ORDER OF DISMISSAL On September 3, 2019, the Appellant, Eric Connolly (Mr.

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 BERTA HERNANDEZ, Appellant v. D1-09-454 BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Respondent Appellants Attorney: Pro Se Berta Hernandez 109 Chester Avenue #1 Chelsea, MA 02150 Respondents Attorney: Kristen J. Daley, Esq. Boston Public Schools Office of Labor Relations 26 Court Street: 3rd Floor Boston, MA 02108 Commissioner: Christopher C.

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 SCOTT OMALLEY, Appellant v. D-05-426 DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE, Respondent Appellants Attorney: Timothy M. Burke, Esq. Law Offices of Timothy M. Burke 160 Gould Street, Suite 111 Needham, MA 02494 (781) 455-0707 tburke@timburkelaw.com Respondents Attorney: Michael B. Halpin, Esq.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION SUFFOLK, ss. JOSE SANTIAGO, Appellant v. Case Nos.: D-05-113 D-04-424 METHUEN POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY OF METHUEN, Respondent Appellants Attorney: Anthony R. DiFruscia, Esquire 302 Broadway Methuen, MA 01844 Respondents Attorney: Peter J. McQuillan, Esquire Office of the City Solicitor 41 Pleasant St. Methuen, MA 01844 Commissioner: John J. Guerin, Jr.

Decision mailed: COMMONWEALTH SUFFOLK, SS OF MASSACHUSETTS /i ligi t] Civil Service Commission CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 Kevin M. Dangelo, Appellant Docket NO.: G2-11-136 Town of Natick, Respondent Appellants Representative: Kevin M. Dangelo, Pro se Respondents Representative: James A. Sheridan Chief of Department Natick Fire Department 22 East Central Street Natick, MA 01760 Daniel M.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION SUFFOLK,ss. RAYMOND LAKE, Appellant v. D-07-203 TOWN OF DARTMOUTH, Respondent Appellants Attorney: William M. Straus, Esquire 15 Hamilton Street New Bedford, MA 02740 Respondents Attorney: Anthony C. Savastano, Esquire 404 County Street New Bedford, MA 02740 Commissioner: John J. Guerin, Jr.

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 JOSEPH McDOWELL, Appellant v. D-05-148 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, Respondent RULING ON MOTION TO CLARIFY ORDER ON REMAND On March 24, 20111, the Civil Service Commission (Commission) allowed Mr.

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place: Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2293 RYAN C. MUTH, Appellant v. D1-10-109 CITY OF LEOMINSTER, Respondent Appellant's Representative: Pro Se Ryan Muth Respondent's Representative: Brian Maser, Esq. Kopelman and Paige, P.C. 101 Arch Street Boston, MA 02110 Commissioner: Christopher C. Bowman DECISION The Appellant, Ryan C.