Box 946 Norfolk, MA 02056 Debra J. Moschos 12 Twin Brooks Cir. Haverhill, MA 01835 Sheila M. Cregg 127 Highland Avenue Baldwinville, MA 01436 Re: SUP-15-4760, SUP-15-4761 Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Department Of Correction and Debra J. Moschos and Sheila M. Creqq Dear Mr. Wilson, Ms. Moschos and Ms.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Correction Industries Drive, POB 946 Norfolk, MA 02056 : Re: SUP-15-4760; SUP-1 5-4761, Commonwealth of Massachusetts Dear Ms. Moschos, Ms. Cregg and Mr.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Correction Industries Drive, POB 946 Norfolk, MA 02056 . Re: SUP-15-4760; SUP-1 5-4761, Commonwealth of Massachusetts Dear Ms. Moschos, Ms. Cregg and Mr.
Box 946 Norfolk, MA 02056 Debra J. Moschos 12 Twin Brooks Cir. Haverhill, MA 01835 Sheila M. Cregg 127 Highland Avenue Baldwinville, MA 01436 Re: SUP-15-4760, SUP-15-4761 Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Department Of Correction and Debra J. Moschos and Sheila M. Creqq Dear Mr. Wilson, Ms. Moschos and Ms.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Correction Industries Drive, POB 946 Norfolk, MA 02056 : Re: SUP-15-4760; SUP-1 5-4761, Commonwealth of Massachusetts Dear Ms. Moschos, Ms. Cregg and Mr.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Correction Industries Drive, POB 946 Norfolk, MA 02056 . Re: SUP-15-4760; SUP-1 5-4761, Commonwealth of Massachusetts Dear Ms. Moschos, Ms. Cregg and Mr.
Norfolk, MA 02056 October 8, 2021 SPR21/2539 Dear Superintendent Ingrid: I have received your petition on behalf of the Norfolk Public Schools (School) requesting an extension of time to produce records, a waiver of statutory limits on fees that may be assessed in responding to the request, permission to charge for time spent segregating or redacting responsive records, and relief from the obligation to respond to the request. G.
Department of Corrections Industries Drive, POB 946 Norfolk, MA 02056 RE: SUP-21-8713 MASS. CORRECTION OFFICERS FED. UNION AND COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Dear Mr. Killian and Mr. Wilson: Please be advised that the Department of Labor Relations has decided to administratively close the above-referenced case as requested by the Parties, for thirty (30) days or until WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 27, 2021.
Box 946 Industries Drive Norfolk, MA 02056 Commissioner: John E. Taylor DECISION The Appellant, William Scanlan (hereinafter Appellant), pursuant to G.L. .31 43, filed an appeal with the Civil Service Commission, (hereinafter Commission) on November 13, 2006, claiming that the Department of Correction (hereinafter DOC, Department or Appointing Authority) did not have just cause to suspend him for three (3) days. The appeal was timely filed.
Box 946 Norfolk, MA 02056 Commissioner: Paul M. Stein DECISION The Appellant, Reginald Gore, appealed to the Civil Service Commission (Commission) pursuant to G.L.c.31, 2(b), from the decision of the Department of Correction, the Appointing Authority (DOC) to bypass him for appointment to the position of Correction Officer I (CO I). The Commission held an evidentiary hearing on March 4, 2014, which was digitally recorded.
Box 946 Norfolk, MA 02056 Commissioner: Cynthia A. Ittleman, Esq. 1 DECISION Pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 31, 2(b), the Appellant, Patrick Lecorps (hereinafter Mr. Lecorps or the Appellant), filed an appeal on July 3, 2012, regarding the decision of the Department of Correction (hereinafter DOC or Appointing Authority) to bypass him for original appointment to the position of Correction Officer I. The Appellant filed a timely appeal.
Box 946 Industries Drive Norfolk, MA 02056 Administrative Magistrate: Kenneth Bresler SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED DECISION Because the appointing authority had a long-standing policy and practice of not promoting employees who were under internal investigation, as the appellant was, the appointing authority was reasonably justified in bypassing him for promotion. I recommend that the Civil Service Commission dismiss the appeal.
Box 946 Norfolk, MA 02056 Commissioner: Daniel M. Henderson DECISION Pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 31, 2(b), Appellant Seta Phay (hereinafter Appellant or Seta) appealed the decision of the Respondent, Massachusetts Department of Correction (hereinafter DOC or Department) to bypass him for appointment as a Correction Officer I (CO I) for the stated reason of an unsatisfactory background check.