Further, the zipper clause incorporated in the par Article 25, Section 3 fails to establish that the Union waiv over transfers of work to employees outside the bargainin; has long held that [] general zipper clauses do not perm: make unilateral changes in mandatory subjects of bargai1 City of Worcester, 15 MLC 1439 (H.O. 1989).

City of Worcester, 15 MLC 1439 (H.O. 1989). Thus, where an employer has a continuing obligation to bargain over mandatory subjects of bargaining under the Law, a zipper clause will not preclude a union from bargaining over employees outside Unit 4.

Reardon, Joyce & Akerson, P.C. 397 Grove Street Worcester, MA 01605 Respondents Attorney: David C. Jenkins, Esq. Kopelman & Paige, P.C. 101 Arch Street Boston, MA 02110-1109 Commissioner: John J. Guerin, Jr.

Reardon, Joyce & Atkinson, PC 397 Grove Street Worcester, MA 01605 Respondents Attorney: Darren R. Klein, Esq. Kopelman & Paige, PC 101 Arch Street Boston, MA. 02110-1109 Commissioner: John J. Guerin, Jr.

Address (street and No., city/towl n, state, and ZIP code) 670 west boylston street Worcester MA 01606 Number 508-854-2883 \7. FAX Number _(508- -854-44390 | | EMPLOYER'S LABOR RELATIONS REPRESENTATIVE 8. Name . MA Association of Community College 9. Telephone Number 781-275-9400 10,11,12,13. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP 14. FAX Number code) 617-542-2904 591 Springs Road Building #2 Bedford MA 01720 15.

Name (print) Signature Title (if any) Barbara Connery/bsa Barbara Connery Field Rep & Organizer Address (street and no., city/town, state, and ZIP code) Telephone Number MTA, 12 East Worcester Street, 2nd Floor, Worcester, MA 01604 508-791-2121 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have served a copy of this Charge of Prohibited Practice on the following representative of the opposing party.

Mile Business Address (street and no., city/town, state, and ZIP code ) 330 Southwest Cutoff, Suite 201, Agent Telephone Number Worcester, MA 01604 508-799-0551 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE | hereby certify that | have served a copy of this Petition on the following representative(s) of the opposing partie(s).

For the Executive Office of Labor and Workforce Development: Dated: eM a 2/ XD 4 ; For the Charging Party: HD OLEer Dora Locke Dated: Ot Deve AA, Jol S 3 Attachment 2 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS COMMISSION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION From: Dora Locke 1029 Pleasant Street Worcester, MA 01602 ' To: Investigator Thiffault Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination 436 Dwight Street, Rm. 220 Springfield, MA 01103 Re: Dora Locke v.

Locke 1029 Pleasant Street Worcester, MA 01602 Melinda Willis Division of Human Resources One Ashburton Place, Room 211 Boston, MA 02108 Re: SUP-14-3515, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Dora L. Locke Dear Ms. Locke and Ms.

Locke Job Service Representative DUA Call Center at 340 Main Street, 4th Floor Worcester, MA Page 27 of 27

Worcester MA 01608 32. E-mail Address ssiegel@mirickoconnell.com | FAX Number 508-983-6297 33. Firm/Organization Name Mirick O'Connell 35. NATURE OF EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS: Municipal/Police Department '36. NAME OF GRIEVANT: Millbury Police Association; Anthony Belliveau | 37.

Mirick, OConnell, DeMallic & Lougee, 1.1.P 100 Front Street Worcester, MA 01608 koconnell Jhb Date: April 4, 2017 Karepin Morgar

. \/ BB 33929 Mirick, OConnell, DeMallie & Lougee, LLP 100 Front Street Worcester, MA 01608-1477 Phone: (508) 791-8500 Fax: (508) 791-8502 jhoban@mirickoconnell.com Dated: May 12, 2017 Client Matter/05875/00171/A3711206.DOCX 3 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, James P. Hoban, hereby certify that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing document, by emailing and mailing a copy, first class mail, postage prepaid, to Kareem A.

(City of Worcester v. Civ. Serv. Commn & Dykas, 12-P-1844 (2013), citing Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 546 (1985) and Murray v. Second Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 389 Mass. 508, 516 (1983) ([D]ecision of the commission is not justified if it is not based on the reasons specified in the charge letter brought by the appointing authority). Here, Mr.

See City of Worcester, 1 MLC 1263 (1985). Policy aside, applying the three-step analysis used to determine if an employee should be accreted into an existing bargaining unit also demonstrates that accretion is not merited here. Under the test, a determination is first made whether the position was included in the original certification of the bargaining unit.