Ct. at 208, 444 N.E.2d at 409 and Town of Lexington v, Civil Service Commn, Docket No, 08CV4644F, Memorandum of Decision and Order, 27 Mass.L.Rptr. 106, 2010 WL 2432051 (Middlesex Super. Ct., May 27, 2010) Judge Dennis Curran held that it was error for the Civil Service Commission to second guess a municipal interview procedure that did not use a numerical scoring system when the town had a reasonable justification for its interview process).

He holds a top-secret security clearance and currently serves as detachment commander for the 211th Military Police Battalion stationed in Lexington MA. (Exhs. 1 & 3; Testimony of Appellant) 3. Mr. Man works as a security consultant with a firm in Boston, MA that concentrates on cyber security and business security.

I Just came across this posting from the Town of Lexington for a Assistant Fire Chief. The posting outlines the duties and they are exactly what we are looking for. There has never been an assistant chief of the department. Thoughts Bob Id. (12:54 p.m.). The Town of Lexington job posting in described detail 14 Essential Duties and Responsibilities of the position, eight of which were directly related to fire prevention. Id. (attachment).

| just came across this position from the Town of Lexington for a[n] Assistant Fire Chief. The posting outlines the duties and they are exactly what we are looking for. There has never been an assistant chief of the department. Coughlin in a September 29, 2011 email message replied: Lets go with this. Have Bill Quigley amend the present org chart to Assist Chief for the packet.

| just came across this position from the Town of Lexington for a[n] Assistant Fire Chief. The posting outlines the duties and they are exactly what we are looking for. There has never been an assistant chief of the department. Coughlin in a September 29, 2011 email message replied: Lets go with this. Have Bill Quigley amend the present org chart to Assist Chief for the packet.

Town of Lexington, 21 MCSR 634 (2008) (discharge upheld based partially on officers dishonesty regarding a use of force incident); and Desharnias v. City of Westfield, 23 MCSR 418 (2009) (discharge upheld based primarily on officers dishonesty about a relatively minor infraction that occurred on his shift).

Town of Lexington, 37 MLC 115, 119, MUP-08-5313 (December 9, 2010); Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 20 MLC 1545, 1552, SUP-3460 (May 13, 1994). Again, the Union has failed to prove its prima facie case. The Union has provided no evidence of an existing practice that was altered or a new practice that was implemented.

Town of Lexington, of Natick, 18 MCSR 79 (2005) (A for the 21 MCSR 589, 597 (2008) citing Sabourin v. civil service test score is the primary tool in determining relative ability, knowledge and skills and in taking a personnel action grounded in basic merit principles.).

Town of Lexington, 21 MCSR 589 (2008) (The Appellants name appeared in the first position with a score of 88); Gibbons v. City of Woburn, 21 MCSR 525 (2008) (Appellant took and passed the promotional examination . . . achieving a score of 91); Dockery v. City of Waltham, 20 MCSR 483 (2007) (scores of 80, 76 [bypassed candidates] and 75 [selected candidate]); Lipka v.

Town of Lexington, 21 MCSR 634 (2008) (discharge upheld based partially on officers dishonesty regarding a use of force incident); and Desharnias v. City of Westfield, 23 MCSR 418 (2009) (discharge upheld based primarily on officers dishonesty about a relatively minor infraction that occurred on his shift). Wine v. City of Holyoke, 31 MCSR 19 (2018).

Antonio dos Santos Framingham, MA 01701 Omaha, NE 68114 Omaha, NE 68114 Omaha, NE 68114 Omaha, NE 68114 Omaha, NE 68114 Omaha, NE 68114 Omaha, NE 68114 Omaha, NE 68114 Framingham, MA Framingham, MA 01702 Framingham, MA 01702 Framingham, MA 01702 Framingham MA, 01702 Framingham, MA 01702 Framingham, MA 01702 Framingham MA, 01702 Framingham, MA 01701 Framingham MA, 01701 Framingham, MA Framingham, MA 01701 Framingham, MA 01701 FRAMINGHAM MA 01701 Lexington

Town of Lexington, 15 Mass. App. Ct. 749, 753, rev. den., 389 Mass. 1104 (1983) (citing Op. of the Justices, 254 Mass. 617, 620 (1926) (quoting Endlich, Interpretation of Statutes 742)). In accordance with this principle, the language of the exception does not negate or undermine the statutes requirements found in elements (a) and (b). Rather, it serves to exempt a narrow group of individuals from these general requirements.