Box 246 Leominster, MA 01453 RE: Open Meeting law Complaint Dear Attorney Angelini: This office received a complaint on June 23, 2014 from Peter and Jill Mann, alleging that the Narragansett Regional School Committee (the "Committee") violated the Open Meeting Law, G.L. c. 30A, 1 8-25. The complaint alleges that the Committee failed to discuss the Manns' May 8, 2014 retaliation complaint in detail during its May 21, 2014 meeting.

WITTNER CHAIR veer mowennes December 21, 2011 ELIZABETH NEUMEIER BOARD MEMBER Robert Roy 80 Winter Street Leominster, MA 01453 HARRIS FREEMAN 7 BOARD MEMBER William Swenson. 94 Sawmill Pond Road Fitchburg, MA 01420 Martha Lipchitz-OConnor, Esq. Human Resources Division One Ashburton Place, Room 207 Boston, MA 02108 RE: SUP-10-5598, Commonwealth of Massachusetts / Commissioner SUP-10-5599 of Administration and Finance Dear Mr. Roy, Mr.

WITTNER CHAIR veer mowennes December 21, 2011 ELIZABETH NEUMEIER BOARD MEMBER Robert Roy 80 Winter Street Leominster, MA 01453 HARRIS FREEMAN 7 BOARD MEMBER William Swenson. 94 Sawmill Pond Road Fitchburg, MA 01420 Martha Lipchitz-OConnor, Esq. Human Resources Division One Ashburton Place, Room 207 Boston, MA 02108 RE: SUP-10-5598, Commonwealth of Massachusetts / Commissioner SUP-10-5599 of Administration and Finance Dear Mr. Roy, Mr.

Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). An action is "justified" when it is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind; guided by common sense and by 9 correct rules of law." Id. at 304, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928); Commissioners of Civil Service v.

City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). An action is justified when it is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind; guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. City of Cambridge at 304, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928). Commissioners of Civil Service v.

City of Leominster, v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App.

City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). An action is justified when it is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind; guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. City of Cambridge at 304, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928). Commissioners of Civil Service v.

Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). An action is "justified" when it is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind; guided by common sense and by correct rules of law." Id. at 304, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928); Commissioners of Civil Service v.

Cambridge at 304, See also City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass.App. Ct. 726, 728, rev. den., 440 Mass. 1108 (2003); Police Dept. of Boston v. Collins, 48 Mass. App.Ct. 411, rev. den., 726 N.E.2d 417 (2000); McIsaac v. Civil Service Commn., 38 Mass. App.Ct. 473, 477 (1995); Town of Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass.App.Ct. 331, rev. den., 390 Mass. 1102 (1983).

See also City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass.App.Ct. 726, 728, rev.den., 440 Mass. 1108 (2003); Police Dept of Boston v. Collins, 48 Mass.App.Ct. 411, rev.den., 726 N.E.2d 417 (2000); McIsaac v. Civil Service Commn, 38 Mass.App.Ct. 473, 477 (1995); Town of Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass.App.Ct. 331, rev.den., 390 Mass. 1102 (1983).