Recreation Department Council on Aging Loring Arena City Cemeteries Administration and Finance Division Accounting Department Assessing Department Chief Financial Officer Department Purchasing Department Technology Services Department Media Service Department Treasurer/Collector Department Inspectional Services Division Inspectional Service Department Weights & Measures Department Public Health Department Planning & Community Development Division Human

Furnishings Total Operating - 18 - - 1,925 - - - 190,024 210,119 233,362 232,428 Page 26 of 108 (934) 5/2/2019 (0.40%) 3:19:47PM CITY OF FRAMINGHAM FISCAL YEAR 2020 RECOMMENDED GENERAL FUND BUDGET Acct # Description FY 2016 Actual FY 2017 Actual - Media Services Total FY 2018 Actual 319,419 FY 2019 Budget 356,215 $ Increase (Decrease) to 2019 Amended FY 2020 Recommended 387,710 389,292 % Increase (Decrease) to 2019 Amended 1,582 0.41% 16,284 3.23% HUMAN

................32 SCHOOLS DIVISION...................................................................................44 FRAMINGHAM PUBLIC LIBRARY..............................................................54 ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE DIVISION............................................59 DIVISION OF PUBLIC HEALTH..................................................................68 CAPITAL PROJECTS AND FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DIVISION.........72 HUMAN

Butler Labor Counsel Human Resources Division 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 600 Boston, MA 02114 (617) 878-9785

The reclassification was denied, and Besse appealed to the Commonwealths 8 Human Resources Division (HRD). By letter dated June 1, 2018, Nancy Daiute, Senior 9 Human Resources Advisor, Organizational Development Group, wrote to Besse that: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 On March 28, 2018, the Human Resources Division received your appeal of the classification of your position.

Sabo, Labor Counsel Human Resources Division 100 Cambridge St., Suite 600 Boston, MA 02114 emily.sabo@mass.gov Dated: January 12, 2022

Bowman DECISION Pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 31 s. 2(b), the Appellant, Melissa Pinckney, (hereinafter Pinckney or Appellant), seeks review of the Human Resources Divisions (hereinafter HRD) decision to accept reasons proffered by the RespondentAppointing Authority, Boston Police Department (hereinafter Department or Appointing Authority), for the bypass of the Appellant for original appointment to the position of Boston police officer.

Ultimately, the hiring committee found the admission to dufifiviant facts amounted to confirmation that the undierlying: facts of the charges were cae, oo Based on these findings, the Department requested a bypass of Suppa from the Human . Resources Division (HARD). On September 11, 2007, HRD accepted the Departments request . and notified Suppa of the bypass. On October 19, 2007, Suppa appealed this Sboldinss On .

The Town filed a requisition with the State Human Resources Division (HRD) on September 5, 2012. Using the required 2n+1 formula, a five name list was generated to fill the two vacancies. The Appellant was ranked second. The first-place candidate was selected to fill the first opening, and the third-place candidate was selected to fill the second opening. (Testimony of Chief Daugherty, Ex. 12) 4.

Hunt), Director of the Boston Police Departments Human Resources Division, testified that the result of the background investigation was presented to a Department hiring committee during a roundtable discussion, which typically involves the Commander of Recruit Investigations, the Director of Human Resources, a Deputy Superintendent from Internal Affairs, and an attorney from the Legal Advisors Office.

After a hearing on the motion held on January 23, 2012, the Commission requested and received comments on Quincys Motion by letter, dated January 30, 2012, from the Massachusetts Human Resources Division (HRD). Quincy filed a Supplemental Brief on February 15, 2012.

The Town requested a Certification from the states Human Resources Division (HRD) to fill two (2) police officer positions with the Department on June 27, 2012. Mr. Oliskys name appeared on Certification number 00169 along with seventeen (17) others.

On or about May 7, 20113, Superintendent Lavallee requested, via letter, that the Massachusetts Human Resources Division (hereinafter HRD) approve the bypass of Mr. 3 Although the letter, submitted as Exhibit 6, is dated May 7, 2010, both Mr. Walker and Superintendent Lavallee testified that that date was likely a typographical error and that the letter had in fact been issued on or about May 7, 2011. 7 Walker.

Veiga appealed his reclassification denial to the states Human Resources Division (HRD). In his appeal request, Mr. Veiga claimed, in party: The HR/EOWLD evaluation and decision was superficial and, was based solely on the Appeal paperwork I prepared with general contents about the duties and on 4 a document (Form 30) with job descriptions which I believe do not reflect correctly the duties I perform.