He had the fifth highest score on Certification List No. 231084 issued by the Human Resources Division (hereinafter the HRD) on November 25, 2003. The list was intended for the appointment of ten (10) permanent intermittent police officers and was valid for a period of twelve (12) weeks. (Testimony of the Appellant and Exhibit 1) 2.

On December 5, 2007, the Human Resources Division notified the Appellant that the reasons for the Departments recommendation to bypass him for promotion were acceptable. The Appellant subsequently filed a timely appeal with the Commission. (Testimony of Ms. Hunt and Joint Exhibit 4) 30. I find that there were no issues regarding the veracity of any individuals testimony in this matter, and therefore I make no adverse credibility assessments.

On or about September 4, 2008, the Human Resources Division's ("HRD") Civil Service Unit sent a letter to the Appellant stating that the Respondent had appointed a candidate whose name appeared below the Appellant's and that HRD had determined that the respondent's stated reasons for bypassing the Appellant were acceptable. (testimony of Valentgas and Appellant) 12.

On June 30, 2005, the Town notified the states Human Resources Division (HRD) that it was bypassing the Appellant for appointment for positive reasons related to the lower-ranked candidates and the following negative reasons related to the Appellant: a) untruthfulness during the application process, including what the Appointing Authority deemed misrepresentations on her written application; and b) a poor credit history, including a bankruptcy filing

The Appointing Authority, in a February 28, 2008 letter to the states Human Resources Division (hereinafter HRD) outlined the negative reasons associated with the Appellant as follows: With respect to Mr. OBrien, [a] panel of supervisory personnel rated him as a poor candidate on two offour rated criteria. The Commission gave this determination significant weight. The Commission reviewed the background checks and found that while Mr.

The Appellant, Ashley Hurst, took and passed the civil service examination for FAO on June 15, 2019 and her name was placed on the FAO eligible list established by the Massachusetts Human Resources Division (HRD) on July 10, 2019. (Stipulated Facts; HRD Prehearing Submission 4/7/20) 2.

Kumar took and passed the civil service examination for Correction Officer and his name was placed on the eligible list established by the Massachusetts Human Resources Division on February 1, 2019. (Stipulated Facts; HRD Pre-Hearing Submission) 4 After Mr. Kumars departure, as stated in his incident report, the police officer spoke to Mr. Kumars wife. She recanted the statements she made in her 209A affidavit about Mr.

On November 1, 2015, the states Human Resources Division (HRD) established an eligible list for police officer, which included the name of Mr. Lewis. (Stipulated Fact) 13. On February 22, 2017 and March 2, 2017, Mr. Lewiss name appeared on Certification #04401 for consideration as a Boston police officer, from which the BPD eventually appointed one hundred thirty (130) police officers, six (6) of whom were ranked below Mr.

JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS The Town of Abington (the Town) has appealed, pursuant to G.L. c. 30A, 14, from a appeal decision of the Massachusetts Civil Service Commission (the Commission) granting the bypass of co-defendant Joao Paulo Leite Pereira de Araujo (Araujo) of the Towns decision to and remove him from consideration for appointment to the position of full-time police officer with the Abington Police Department (APD) and to ask the states Human

Commonwealth of Massachusetts Human Resources Division 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 600 Boston, MA 02114 (617) 878-9888 melissa.thomson@mass.gov CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on January 18, 2019, I hereby caused a true and complete copy of the foregoing to be served by email on Counsel for the Union, Ashley Peel, Esq., at apeel@afscme93.org and legaloffice@afscme93.org. 2