He had the fifth highest score on Certification List No. 231084 issued by the Human Resources Division (hereinafter the HRD) on November 25, 2003. The list was intended for the appointment of ten (10) permanent intermittent police officers and was valid for a period of twelve (12) weeks. (Testimony of the Appellant and Exhibit 1) 2.

On December 5, 2007, the Human Resources Division notified the Appellant that the reasons for the Departments recommendation to bypass him for promotion were acceptable. The Appellant subsequently filed a timely appeal with the Commission. (Testimony of Ms. Hunt and Joint Exhibit 4) 30. I find that there were no issues regarding the veracity of any individuals testimony in this matter, and therefore I make no adverse credibility assessments.

On or about September 4, 2008, the Human Resources Division's ("HRD") Civil Service Unit sent a letter to the Appellant stating that the Respondent had appointed a candidate whose name appeared below the Appellant's and that HRD had determined that the respondent's stated reasons for bypassing the Appellant were acceptable. (testimony of Valentgas and Appellant) 12.

On June 30, 2005, the Town notified the states Human Resources Division (HRD) that it was bypassing the Appellant for appointment for positive reasons related to the lower-ranked candidates and the following negative reasons related to the Appellant: a) untruthfulness during the application process, including what the Appointing Authority deemed misrepresentations on her written application; and b) a poor credit history, including a bankruptcy filing

The Appointing Authority, in a February 28, 2008 letter to the states Human Resources Division (hereinafter HRD) outlined the negative reasons associated with the Appellant as follows: With respect to Mr. OBrien, [a] panel of supervisory personnel rated him as a poor candidate on two offour rated criteria. The Commission gave this determination significant weight. The Commission reviewed the background checks and found that while Mr.

Human Resources Division One Ashburton Place, Room 211 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 878-9888 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on October 16, 2017, I hereby caused a true and complete copy of the foregoing to be served by email on Counsel for the Union: Todd Cochran, Esq., at tcochran@pylerome.com and jfletcher@pylerome.com. /s/ Melissa A. Thomson ___________ 2

CS-07-712 Joseph Schiavone 8. ory In addition, all City employees including the Appellant attended a mandat the training session with the Human Resource Division designed to explain Sexual Harassment Policy (testimony of Brian Kerins). 4:00 9. During the early winter of 2005, the Appellant was assigned to work the p.m. to midnight shift (testimony of the Appellant). Depot, 10, Ona morning in January of 2005, Mr.

On or about May 31, 2011, the City asked the States Human Resources Division (hereinafter HRD) for a Certification of candidates for the appointment of six (6) permanent reserve police officers. (Appointing Authority Exhibit 1) 6. On June 21, 2011, HRD sent the City Certification No. 201560, on which the Appellants name appeared tenth. (Appointing Authority Exhibit 2) 7.

Busas name appeared on a certification issued to the FRPD by the Commonwealths Human Resources Division. (HRD). (Testimony of Chief of Police Racine (Chief Racine)) 2 4. After signing the certification, Mr. Busa received an application and questionnaire to fill out. (Testimony of Chief Racine) 5. On his questionnaire, Mr. Busa indicated yes on questions eighty-seven (87) and eightyeight (88), certifying that every answer he gave was accurate.

The state Human Resources Division (HRD) issued Scott W. Carton v. Watertown G2-11-314, . Certification 09192011 on May 14, 2010, The Appellant ranked fourth. CS-12-339 (Exhibits 1, 10 and 12; Testimony of Appellant) . After the Appellant was bypassed for the position of Temporary Lieutenant in 2010, he filed an appeal with the Civil Service Commission. 2011). Carton y.