On January 6, 2011, the Department requisitioned a Certification from the states Human Resources Division (HRD) seeking the names of eligible individuals to appoint forty-five (45) police officers. (Stipulated Fact) 2 4. On January 24, 2011, HRD sent Certification No. 203604 to the Department. Mr. Perrys name appeared on page 17 of the Certification.

On August 7, 2012, the Human Resources Division (HRD) created an eligibility list for the Correction Officer I position, and Mr. Whelan was ranked 20th of the candidates who 1 After Exhibit 15 was admitted into the record, DOC pointed out that one of its pages appeared to be missing. I ordered Mr. Whelan to supply the missing page, but he did not do so. The exhibit remains in the record.

The Appellant appealed the decision of the Human Resources Division (HRD) accepting the reasons proffered by the Appointing Authority for by-pass in March 2001, and a hearing was held before this Commission on September 15, 2003. Aponte v. Boston Police Department, G-01-1072. By decision rendered by Commissioner Daniel M.

By letter to the Human Resources Division (hereinafter HRD) dated February 10, 2005, the City of Haverhill, pursuant to G.L. c. 31, section 27, submitted its reason for bypass letter. As justification for bypassing the Appellant, the Respondent stated the following: A. That the Appellants employment with UML was not favorable. B.

The BPD notified the Human Resources Division (HRD) that it was bypassing the Appellant for appointment for the following reason: Mr. Fay was involved in an incident in July 2006 where police responded to a call from a friend to respond to a domestic situation between he and his girlfriend around 1:00 A.M. [Maryann], Mr. Fays girlfriend at the time, explained that they were at a bar, both intoxicated, and began to argue.

Section 6 mandates that an appointing authority making new appointments obtain from the Massachusetts Human Resources Division (HRD) a . certification list of eligible candidates, The appointing authority must hire from the beginning of the list, starting with those individuals with the highest scores. Id.

On April 18, 2003, the Town of Hanover submitted a civil service requisition form to the Human Resources Division (HRD) in order to fill five permanent intermittent police officer positions. (Exhibit 1) 3. On May 6, 2003, the Appellant was placed on a certified eligibility list by the HRD for an original appointment for one (1) of five (5) Permanent Intermittent Patrolman positions with the Hanover Police Department. (Exhibit 1). 4.

The Town was required to rescind its offer of employment based on the Appellants failure of the pre-employment medical examination due to a Category A medical condition, asthma, which is considered an automatic disqualifier of Civil Service employment according to the legislatively 1 promulgated and binding Commonwealth of Massachusetts Human Resources Division Physicians Guide Initial-Hire Medical Standards (Revised July 2005) (hereinafter HRD medical

Henderson DECISION Pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 30, 49, the Appellant, Joseph Kowalski, (hereinafter Appellant or Kowalski), is appealing the November 15, 2006 decision of the Human Resources Division (HRD) denying his request for reclassification from the position of Natural Resource Specialist to the position of Environmental Analyst III within the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (hereinafter DCR or Department).

Henderson 1 DECISION Pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 30 49, the Appellant, Gregory Ramstine (hereinafter Appellant) is appealing the April 11, 2008 decision of the Human Resources Division (hereinafter HRD) denying his request for reclassification from the position of Civil Engineer II (CE II) to the position of Civil Engineer III (CE III) in the Massachusetts Department of 1 The Commission gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Maimoona