Tags
Agencies
Show All
Displaying items 141-150 of 214 in total
138 documents · · City of Framingham · Fulfilled
Fitzpatrick Tanine Braga Andrew Reynolds Framingham, MA 01701 Framingham, MA 01701 Milford, MA 01757 Framingham MA, 01701 Framingham, MA 01701 Framingham, MA 01701 Framingham, MA 01701 Framingham MA, 01702 Framingham, MA 01702 Framingham, MA, 01701 Holliston, MA 01746 Needham, MA Ashland MA, 01721 Framingham, MA 01702 Ashland, MA 01721 Ashland, MA 01721 Framingham, MA 01702 Yesenia L.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Town of Wayland Police Department 2/8/07
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
Law Offices of Timothy Burke 160 Gould Street, Suite 111 Needham, MA 02494 Respondents Attorney: Elizabeth Valerio, Esq. Deutsch, Williams, Brooks, Derensis & Holland 99 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110-1213 Commissioner: John J. Guerin, Jr.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
HRD and City of Boston 1/31/08
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
Rogal & Donnellan, P.C. 43 Charles Street Needham, MA 02494-2905 (FOR: Kenneth MacMaster & Trent Holland) Paul T. Hynes, Esq. Angoff, Goldman, Manning, Wanger & Hynes, P.C. 45 Bromfield Street Boston, MA 02108-4106 (FOR: Arthur Stratford) Respondent's Attorney Mary Jo Harris, Esq. Morgan, Brown & Joy LLP 200 State Street Boston.
2 documents · · City of Watertown · Fulfilled
Thank ilano, Maureen ; Shattuck, Gayle Subjec ma.gov>; Shattuck, Gayle Subject: RE: Public Records Request Janet- Perso orrison, Kathi Cc: Morrissey, Melissa S ve Reporter 189 B St I Needham, MA 02494 office: 617.630.3358 I cell: 617.356.5459 [New sig image] From ty Hall at a mutually convenient time that
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
Rogal and Donnellan, P.C. 43 Charles Street Needham, MA 02494-2905 (781) 455-7100 jdonnellan@rogalanddonnellan.com Respondents Attorney: Sheila Gallagher, Esq. Boston Police Department Office of the Legal Advisor One Schroeder Plaza Boston, MA 02120 (617) 343-4550 gallaghers.bpd@ci.boston.ma.us Commissioner: Christopher C.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Town of Charlton 1/25/07
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
Law Offices of Timothy Burke 160 Gould Street, Suite 111 Needham, MA 02494 Respondents Attorney: James F. Cosgrove, Esq. Cosgrove & Blatt 390 Main Street Worcester, MA 01608 Commissioner: John J. Guerin, Jr. DECISION Pursuant to the provisions of M.G.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
Lowell Police Association / Lowell, City of
2 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
City/town, State, ZIP Code Needham MA 02494 16. FAX Number | 15. E-mail Address jburke@timbur kelaw.com 16. Firm/Organization Name Law Offices of Timothy M. Burke | EMPLOYER 18. Name City of Lowell 19. Telephone Number (978-674-4000 20. Address (24. FAX NUmber 375 Merrimack Street 21,22,23. City/town, State, ZIP Code Lowell MA 01852 LABOR RELATIONS REPRESENTATIVE 25. Name Hannah Pappenheim 26. Title Assistant City Solicitor 27.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Dabene, Paul v. Boston Police Department 4/12/18
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
Burke 160 Gould Street, Suite 100 Needham, MA 02494 Appearance for Respondent: Devin Guimont, Esq. Office of Labor Relations, BPD One Schroeder Plaza, 3rd Floor Boston, MA 02120 Commissioner: Christopher C. Bowman DECISION On October 4, 2017, the Appellant, Paul Dabene Jr., (Mr.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Chermesino, Robert v. Boston Police Department 7/29/10
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
License to carry a firearm, issued to him from the Town of Needham in 2002. He has never had any problem regarding this license. (Exhibit 5, testimony of Appellant) 2. In May of 2005, the Appellant took the examination for the position of police officer. (Stipulation of Facts) 3. The Appellants name appeared on Certification #270048 for the position of permanent fulltime police officer.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
City of Lynn 6/17/10
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
Town of Needham G2-07-2110 (where the Commission overturned the bypass of the promotional appointment to the position of Fire Lieutenant. Where claims of misuse of sick time did not hold up to review and since the Appellant was never disciplined for the alleged sick time abuse... Id at 24.) C. There Was No Evidence That The Bypass was to Select More Qualified Officers As the Commission explained in the cases of Reilly and McCarthy v.
Displaying items 141-150 of 214 in total