In 1999, the Environmental Protection Agency (the EPA), General Electric Company (GE) and the City ofPittsfield signed a settlement agreement to clean-up the former GE site in Pittsfield and the first two miles of the Housatonic River which had become contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
In 1999, the Environmental Protection Agency (the EPA), General Electric Company (GE) and the City ofPittsfield signed a settlement agreement to clean-up the former GE site in Pittsfield and the first two miles of the Housatonic River which had become contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
In 1999, the Environmental Protection Agency, General Electric Company (GE) and the City ofPittsfield signed a settlement agreement to clean-up the former General Electric site in Pittsfield and the first two miles of the Housatonic River which had become contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
City ofPittsfield, 22 MCSR 34 (2009); Liswell v. Registry of Motor Vehicles, 20 MCSR 355 (2007); Redfern v. Holyoke Public Schools, 20 MCSR 260 (2007); Crowell v. City of Woburn, 14 MCSR 167 (2001). See generally, Campbell v. City of Boston, 337 Mass. 676 (1958). Moreover, the ten-day limitations period to appeal from an unlawful discharge has long expired. Id. 6 In sum, Mr.
In 1999, the Environmental Protection Agency, General Electric Company (GE) and the City ofPittsfield signed a settlement agreement to clean-up the former General Electric site in Pittsfield and the first two miles of the Housatonic River which had become contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
In 1999, the Environmental Protection Agency, General Electric Company (GE) and the City ofPittsfield signed a settlement agreement to clean-up the former General Electric site in Pittsfield and the first two miles of the Housatonic River which had become contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
City ofPittsfield, 22 MCSR 34 (2009); Travers v. City of Fall River, 21 MCSR 182 (2008); Liswell v. Registry of Motor Vehicles, 20, MCSR 355 (2007) The legislative history of Section 46D, if significant at all, tends to confirm the very narrowly limited legislative intent behind that statute.
Suite 201 Pittsfield MA 01201 16. E-mail address nalper@massteacher.org 17. Firm/Organization Name Mass Teachers Association | G Unit Involved _ 120. No. of employees in Unit 18. Included [Administrator's Union 19. Excluded 7h, | '21, Are any of the employees included in the unit currently represented? Y INCUMBENT EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION (if any) 23, Telephone Number 413-683-1330 22. Name Administrators Union 28. FAX Number 24,25,26,27.
Dupere Law Offices 94 North Elm Street, Suite 307 Westfield, MA 01085 Steve Messina 137 Balance Rock Road Pittsfield, MA 01201 Neil Alper Massachusetts Teachers Association 188 East Street, Suite 201 Pittsfield, MA 01201 RE: MCR-17-6202, Central Berkshire Regional School District Dear Mr. Dupere, Mr. Messina, and Mr.
City ofPittsfield, 22 MCSR 729 (2009). Poor employment history may also be a factor taken into account providing reasonable justification to bypass a candidate. Modig v. Worcestor Police Department, 21 MCSR 78 (2008). 9 Here, the decision to bypass the Appellant was based upon his extensive disciplinary history with the Norwood Police Department.
See City ofPittsfield, 33 MLC 167, 168 (2007). However, it is a basic tenet of labor law that an employer is free to discuss terms and conditions of employment with employees as long as those discussions do not undermine the status of the bargaining representative. Woods Hole, Marthas Vineyard & Nantucket Steamship Auth., 33 MLC 56, 60 (2006) (citing Service Employees Intern. Union, AFL-CIO, Local 509 v.
See City ofPittsfield, 33 MLC 167, 168 (2007). However, it is a basic tenet of labor law that an employer is free to discuss terms and conditions of employment with employees as long as those discussions do not undermine the status of the bargaining representative. Woods Hole, Marthas Vineyard & Nantucket Steamship Auth., 33 MLC 56, 60 (2006) (citing Service Employees Intern. Union, AFL-CIO, Local 509 v.