SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT MUPL-18-6466 . The Fireman (DeLeon) and Oilers, understand and Local Union agree that this 3 (Union) and Ricardo is a settlement to DeLeon resolve a its commitment to disputed claim and that this Settlement Agreement does not constitute an admission of liability or fact. . While the Union does not admit liability, it reaffirms follow M.G.L.

Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (1), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): |I 40. Name 41. Representative to contact 42. Telephone Ricardo De Leon Edmundtke-Gabriel- Number 617-242-1410

The City will continue to abide by the guidelines set forth in settlement agreement MUP 8044. SECTION 4. The City will supply the Union with a list of qualified drivers to augment the Union work force in times of snow and sanding emergency to drive C.D.L. trucks. The Union agrees to use said personnel in the event the Union cannot supply sufficient personnel.

The Appellants counsel submitted a settlement agreement15 for another BPD officer who had been arrested on charges of OUI and Failure to Use Care in Stopping, as a means of establishing a reference point for an appropriate suspension for the Appellant for the OUI incident.

Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), (Employer (E): Goi2 Wd 2Td28S4 a1 , |O 40. Name 41. Representative to contact Petersham Education Association 42.

The purpose of deferral is to encourage the prompt and effective settlement of public sector [labor] disputes. City of Holyoke, 29 MLC 97, 98, MUP-2734 (2002). [inter alia] the issue posed Generally the Commission defers when ... is essentially a question of contract interpretation resources of the Commission and the parties can be conserved through deferral. Sch.

L] Yes x] No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 18. Name 19. Representative to contact 20. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 23.

[q C Yes No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the changing party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 18. Name 19. Representative to contact 20. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 23. The Charging Party is an: Korp 2O fC becch hlereso0c!

ARTICLE 13 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE Tt is the intent of the parties to the Agreement to use their best efforts to encourage the informal and prompt settlement of grievances which may arise between the Union or a member or members of the bargaining unit and the District.

The City offered a settlement proposal whereby six (6) of the pending fifteen (15) appeals would be allowed and the Appellants nine (9) appeals would be withdrawn and not pursued to arbitration.

IV] a Yes No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name Tomasa Pujol 19. 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number (See attached) 617-635-0192 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21.

However, in the Globe case the Court held that governmental entities are not "permitted under the principles of governing law to redact.. .the names of public employees who receive public funds in settlements of claims, or other names of public employees who receive public funds in settlements of claims, or other information on the basis simply that it might facilitate identification of those individuals." Globe Newspaper Co.

Office of Admin. and Finance, Suffolk Superior Court Civil Action No. 11-01184-A at 34-35 (June 14, 2013) (holding governmental entities are not "permitted under the principles of governing law to redact ... the names of public employees who receive public funds in settlements of claims, or other information on the basis simply that it might facilitate identification of those individuals.").

Page 3 January 5, 2018 SPRl 7/1735 who receive public funds in settlements of claims, or other information on the basis simply that it might facilitate identification of those individuals." See id. at 34-35.

The City now desire to bargain issues which it previously withdrew to reach a settlement. Examples are the issuance of Narcan, use of Tazers, body and vehicle cameras. Furthermore, the City is seeking to replace officers who perform dispatch duties by hiring a civilian dispatch force, and failing to recognize ARTICLE 24, PROTECTION OF WORK OPPOTUNITIES (attached).

The Respondent denies that it now desires to bargain issues which it previously withdrew to reach a settlement. In further answering, the Respondent submits that the Charging Party requested bargaining regarding deployment of Naloxone (hereinafter referred to as Narcan). Tazers were implemented over two years ago in in December of 2015. The Respondent failed to request bargaining within six (6) months of the implementation date.